In March 2025, President Trump convened a meeting with top executives from the oil and gas sector at the White House, addressing critical issues such as drilling policies and trade tariffs. Limited details were initially released, prompting questions about the discussions held. New insights from journalists Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan, detailed in their book “Regime Change,” illuminate Trump’s alignment with fossil fuel interests and his aggressive use of presidential authority.
During the meeting, oil executives voiced concerns over state-level climate regulations in Vermont and New York, prompting Stephen Miller, Trump’s policy advisor, to immediately contact Attorney General Pam Bondi. Within weeks, the administration filed lawsuits to block enforcement of these laws. Additionally, ExxonMobil CEO Darren Woods criticized EU environmental policies, leading Trump to direct Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick to impose tariffs until the EU revised its regulations.
In the Cabinet Room, Miller requested executives identify 10 projects to accelerate under Trump’s energy agenda, emphasizing the need to maximize domestic energy production. Chevron CEO Mike Wirth advocated for extending the company’s license in Venezuela, which later aligned with the administration’s escalation of tensions with Venezuela and subsequent Chevron expansion.
Swan described the atmosphere as one where executives were “in awe” of Trump’s unilateral decision-making, noting that no formal policy process governed the proceedings. “Trump essentially said, ‘Make it so, it shall be done,’” he observed. A White House spokesperson stated that Trump regularly considers industry input to prioritize American energy dominance for economic and security benefits.
Unlike usual lobbying dynamics, Trump’s administration adopted an aggressive stance, pressuring executives to intensify drilling efforts. “They weren’t the most aggressive people in the room,” Swan said. “The Trump team was pushing them to open floodgates for energy production.” This reflected Trump’s long-standing preference for traditional energy over renewables, rooted in his nostalgic vision of heavy industry as the economic backbone.
Executives were reportedly impressed by Trump’s assertive use of executive power, with one noting, “I would never want a Democrat to have that same sense of authority.” The meeting underscored the alignment between Trump’s policies and fossil fuel interests, leveraging presidential power to advance industry demands with minimal oversight.
Trump Administration Rescinds Endangered Species Act Protection Through Semantic Shift
The Trump administration is dismantling wildlife protections by redefining the term “harm” under the Endangered Species Act. For over five decades, the law prohibited habitat destruction that significantly modifies ecosystems, a standard upheld by the Supreme Court. Friday’s rule change, issued by the Interior and Commerce Departments, eliminates protections for endangered species’ habitats, permitting activities like farming, drilling, and development in previously safeguarded areas. Environmentalists condemn this as the most severe weakening of wildlife protections in 50 years.
Also Read
- Labour’s Political Crisis Intensifies Over Grooming Gang Release and Deportation Controversy
- Suspect Charged After Targeting Muslim Victim in Utah Mall Attack Over Religion
- Why has Lindsey Graham’s sister inherited his Senate seat after his death?
- Senator Durbin Calls for Reform Following Fatal ICE Encounters During Vehicle Stops

