Historically, central Utah’s Castle Valley has been a coal hub, with mining operations on the slopes of the Wasatch Plateau to the west active since the late 1800s. A different energy development arrived in the region in June 2026, when a large solar power and battery storage plant came online in the sunny valley about 130 miles (210 kilometers) southeast of Salt Lake City.
The recently constructed Green River Energy Center, seen in the Landsat 8 image above (right), features nearly one million solar panels and roughly 500 batteries on several square miles of previously undeveloped land. The facility has 400 megawatts of solar-generating capacity with another 400 megawatts of battery storage. That places it among the many utility-scale solar power and battery storage projects that the U.S. Energy Information Administration expects to be plugged into the country’s grid in 2026.
The Utah facility is slated to supply power to Salt Lake City and other areas across the state, according to news reports, and project staff estimate it could produce enough electricity for more than 100,000 homes. With its integrated battery storage, the plant has the potential to generate power at all hours, even when the Sun isn’t shining. And the Green River Energy Center can build on Castle Valley’s energy legacy by utilizing existing transmission lines originally built for coal-fired power plants in the area.
Though Utah adopted coal as its state rock and has long relied on it for energy, other sources, such as solar and geothermal, are becoming larger parts of the state’s energy mix. In 2025, coal fueled about half of the state’s electricity generation, down from about 75 percent in 2015. Meanwhile, solar grew to account for about 14 percent of generation in 2025, up from nearly zero a decade before. Satellite data can be useful to planners and policymakers involved in energy transitions for assessing the potential of renewable energy systems and tracking their adoption and performance.
NASA Earth Observatory images by Lauren Dauphin, using Landsat data from the U.S. Geological Survey. Story by Lindsey Doermann.
Also Read
- Mapping Local Surveillance: How the Atlas of Surveillance Tracks Police Technology
- Microsoft Incident Halts Azure West US Services for Over 4 Hours
- Court Extends Stay on Paramount and Warner Bros. Discovery Merger</TITLE]A federal judge announced on Thursday that Paramount’s acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery cannot proceed until at least August 18, as the court reviews two separate lawsuits attempting to halt the transaction.This decision extends the current moratorium on the deal. Previously, on Monday, Judge Araceli Martínez-Olguín of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California imposed a 14-day freeze following antitrust lawsuits filed by a coalition of states. During that ruling, the judge scheduled a hearing for August 3 to determine whether a permanent injunction should be issued to block the merger for the duration of the litigation.However, Paramount has petitioned Judge Martínez-Olguín to postpone the hearing until later in August to permit witness testimony. Additionally, the Writers Guild of America—which launched its own legal challenge against the merger this month over potential negative impacts on screenwriters—has requested that its injunction request be heard alongside the states’ motion.On Thursday, Judge Martínez-Olguín extended the delay for an additional 14 days, through August 17. The judge indicated a willingness to reschedule the hearing beyond that date, provided all parties reach an agreement on a new timeline and Paramount guarantees the deal will not close in the meantime.The legal challenges threaten Paramount’s strategic objective to create a media powerhouse spanning two film studios, streaming platforms HBO Max and Paramount+, and broadcast/news entities CBS and CNN. Prolonged delays carry significant financial risks: under the current agreement, Paramount must pay Warner Bros. Discovery shareholders $650 million per quarter for every quarter the merger remains uncompleted.A representative for California Attorney General Rob Bonta, who is leading the multi-state litigation, stated that his office is prepared to argue against what they term Paramount’s “illegal acquisition.” Paramount has not yet issued a formal response to requests for comment.
- FDA Advisory Panel Weighs Approval of Seven Controversial Peptides for Compounding Pharmacies