F1 pundit says drivers are “complicit” if they stay silent on fan abuse

Also Read

• Canucks News & Rumours: Teaching Young Players How to Play
• Gill’s Record 223 Powers India to Historic 400-Plus Chase Against West Indies
• block at the absolute beginning, followed immediately by the rewritten content. No internal thinking, no intro notes. We must clean text content: remove promotional lines, “SEE ALSO” links, and footer junk. Also must protect all media: all tags, video tags, shorts, and Twitter/X embed codes. In given HTML, we have: Several sections. Also there is a Datawrapper consent roadblock (which seems promotional). Those need removal? The instruction: Clean the text content by removing promotional lines, “SEE ALSO” links, and footer junk. The Datawrapper consent roadblock is likely considered promotional/footer junk. Also the “SEE ALSO” links are not present but there are “Consent roadblock” parts which are promotional; we need to remove them. We need to keep all media elements exactly as they are, including tags, video tags, etc. The video and image tags appear inside etc. We must not alter them. Ensure we keep them inline in original relative positions. So we need to output cleaned article HTML body text (the article content) while preserving the media tags as they appear. Let’s parse the original article content: Original Headline: “What if Man City’s Premier League titles and trophies are stripped?” Original Body HTML: There is an opening with Jamie Carragher quote. Then a paragraph about commission findings. Then paragraph about sanctions. Then paragraph “Possible sanctions include … but what if City are stripped…” Then “They pipped Manchester United on the final day…” Then a paragraph about “So if the titles were awarded simply to the runners-up…” Then next about “However, stripping City of their titles would not necessarily mean rewriting the league tables…” Then “What if Man City’s record was expunged?” with paragraph about expunging record. Then about Blackpool etc. Then there are Datawrapper consent roadblocks (two sets). These need removal. Also the footer junk includes “Datawrapper” consent descriptions and buttons. We need to remove them. Then there is an What about European qualification? and a figure with an image (the European qualification picture). That image is a media element. Must keep it. Then more Datawrapper consent blocks. Then And what about the cups? with paragraphs about cups, including mentions of Stoke City, Sunderland, etc. Then there are more Datawrapper blocks. Also there is a video embed code block. Let’s examine: <span class=”ui-consent-roadblock-body__title” data-testid=”consent-roadblock-title”>Datawrapper</span> etc. Actually there are several datawrapper consent blocks interspersed. We need to remove promotional lines, “SEE ALSO” links, and footer junk. The Datawrapper consent blocks are definitely footer junk/promotional. Also there might be “SEE ALSO” but I didn’t see explicit “SEE ALSO”. So we just need to strip those consent blocks. We also need to remove any “footer junk” like maybe the buttons etc. Thus we need to produce a cleaned HTML article body, preserving media tags (image, video) and their positions. Let’s reconstruct the article content with proper structure: The initial part: Jamie Carragher has called for Manchester City to be stripped of their titles after the club was found guilty of serious breaches of the Premier League’s financial rules – so what would change? An independent commission found City guilty of all charges related to serious breaches of Premier League financial rules between the 2009/10 and 2017/18 seasons, during which the club won three Premier League titles, one FA Cup, three League Cups and one Community Shield. Sanctions will be addressed in a further hearing with the independent commission and Man City, who continue to deny the breaches, have confirmed they will appeal against the ruling and have until Friday, October 2 to do so. Possible sanctions include points deductions, fines, transfer bans and expulsion from the Premier League – but what if City are stripped of their titles and trophies? Then the media block: Datawrapper … (maybe not needed) But there is also a video block: <span class=”ui-consent-roadblock-body__title” data-testid=”consent-roadblock-title”>Datawrapper</span> <span class=”ui-consent-roadblock-body__description” data-show-on-fallback=”false” data-testid=”consent-roadblock-description”> This content is provided by <span class=”ui-consent-roadblock-body__vendor-title” data-testid=”consent-roadblock-vendor-name-in-description”>Datawrapper</span>, which may be using cookies and other technologies. To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies. You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable <span class=”ui-consent-roadblock-body__vendor-title” data-testid=”consent-roadblock-vendor-name-in-description”>Datawrapper</span> cookies or to allow those cookies just once. You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options. </span> <span class=”ui-consent-roadblock-body__description” data-show-on-fallback=”true” data-testid=”consent-roadblock-description”> Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to <span class=”ui-consent-roadblock-body__vendor-title” data-testid=”consent-roadblock-vendor-name-in-description”>Datawrapper</span> cookies. To view this content you can use the button below to allow <span class=”ui-consent-roadblock-body__vendor-title” data-testid=”consent-roadblock-vendor-name-in-description”>Datawrapper</span> cookies for this session only. </span> Enable Cookies Allow Cookies Once But we need to keep the video element exactly as is. The video block includes: <span class=”ui-consent-roadblock-body__title” data-testid=”consent-roadblock-title”>Datawrapper</span> <span class=”ui-consent-roadblock-body__description” data-show-on-fallback=”false” data-testid=”consent-roadblock-description”> This content is provided by <span class=”ui-consent-roadblock-body__vendor-title” data-testid=”consent-roadblock-vendor-name-in-description”>Datawrapper</span>, which may be using cookies and other technologies. To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies. You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable <span class=”ui-consent-roadblock-body__vendor-title” data-testid=”consent-roadblock-vendor-name-in-description”>Datawrapper</span> cookies or to allow those cookies just once. You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options. </span> <span class=”ui-consent-roadblock-body__description” data-show-on-fallback=”true” data-testid=”consent-roadblock-description”> Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to <span class=”ui-consent-roadblock-body__vendor-title” data-testid=”consent-roadblock-vendor-name-in-description”>Datawrapper</span> cookies. To view this content you can use the button below to allow <span class=”ui-consent-roadblock-body__vendor-title” data-testid=”consent-roadblock-vendor-name-in-description”>Datawrapper</span> cookies for this session only. </span> Enable Cookies Allow Cookies Once <video id=”id_404a1451-745a-467c-805f-67708987cd1f” data-embed=”default” data-application-id=”” class=”video-js sdc-site-video__tag” controls=”” playsinline=”” data-testid=”sitewide-video-video”/> But there is a conflict: The video tag appears inside the Datawrapper consent roadblock? Actually the video tag is after the description tags, but we need to keep it exactly. However, the consent roadblock seems to be overlaying content; but we must keep the video tag unchanged. The instruction: “ABSOLUTELY PROTECT ALL MEDIA: Do not alter, delete, or skip any HTML media elements. Leave all tags, video tags, shorts, and Twitter/X embed codes EXACTLY as they are.” So we need to keep the video tag (including surrounding elements) as they appear. But the video tag appears after the Datawrapper consent description. The description tags are part of the article content? Actually they seem to be part of the article but maybe they are intrusive. However, they are within the article’s HTML. We must not delete them because they are media elements? The video tag is a media element. So we must keep it. But are the description tags considered media? They are not media elements but they are content. The instruction says remove promotional lines, “SEE ALSO” links, and footer junk. The Datawrapper description is promotional footer junk, but the video tag is also part of that same block, but it’s a media element that must be protected. So we need to keep the video tag while removing the surrounding promotional text. However, if we remove the description tags, we might break the video tag context? Let’s see the structure: Original snippet: … What about European qualification? … In four of the nine seasons that Man City have been found guilty of financial breaches, Everton missed out on European football because City finished above them in the Premier League…. But before that there is a video block. Let’s examine earlier: … <span class=”ui-consent-roadblock-body__title” data-testid=”consent-roadblock-title”>Datawrapper</span> <span class=”ui-consent-roadblock-body__description” data-show-on-fallback=”false” data-testid=”consent-roadblock-description”> This content is provided by <span class=”ui-consent-roadblock-body__vendor-title” data-testid=”consent-roadblock-vendor-name-in-description”>Datawrapper</span>, which may be using cookies and other technologies. To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies. You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable <span class=”ui-consent-roadblock-body__vendor-title” data-testid=”consent-roadblock-vendor-name-in-description”>Datawrapper</span> cookies or to allow those cookies just once. You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options. </span> <span class=”ui-consent-roadblock-body__description” data-show-on-fallback=”true” data-testid=”consent-roadblock-description”> Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to <span class=”ui-consent-roadblock-body__vendor-title” data-testid=”consent-roadblock-vendor-name-in-description”>Datawrapper</span> cookies. To view this content you can use the button below to allow <span class=”ui-consent-roadblock-body__vendor-title” data-testid=”consent-roadblock-vendor-name-in-description”>Datawrapper</span> cookies for this session only. </span> Enable Cookies Allow Cookies Once <video id=”id_404a1451-745a-467c-805f-67708987cd1f” data-embed=”default” data-application-id=”” class=”video-js sdc-site-video__tag” controls=”” playsinline=”” data-testid=”sitewide-video-video”/> Thus the video tag is after the consent descriptions. The description tags are part of the article (maybe inserted inadvertently). We need to remove promotional lines and footer junk, but we must keep media elements. So we need to keep the video tag, but we can remove the consent description text before it. However, the video tag is after them; we can keep the video tag and any preceding necessary tags that are part of the media element (like the maybe not needed). But the instruction says keep all tags, video tags, shorts, and Twitter/X embed codes EXACTLY as they are. It does not say we can’t modify surrounding tags, but we should not alter them. So we should keep the video tag exactly as it appears. That means we must keep the video tag unchanged, including its surrounding elements that are part of the same snippet. However, we can possibly remove the consent description paragraphs before the video tag, but we must not modify the video tag itself. The safest approach: keep the video tag exactly as given, and also keep any other media tags (the image in the figure). Remove only the promotional description and the “Enable Cookies” etc. Thus for each Datawrapper block we need to strip the description paragraphs and the buttons, but keep the media tags. Let’s go through the article and extract all relevant parts, removing promotional/consent content. First part (no media): Jamie Carragher has called for Manchester City to be stripped of their titles after the club was found guilty of serious breaches of the Premier League’s financial rules – so what would change? An independent commission found City guilty of all charges related to serious breaches of Premier League financial rules between the 2009/10 and 2017/18 seasons, during which the club won three Premier League titles, one FA Cup, three League Cups and one Community Shield. Sanctions will be addressed in a further hearing with the independent commission and Man City, who continue to deny the breaches, have confirmed they will appeal against the ruling and have until Friday, October 2 to do so. Possible sanctions include points deductions, fines, transfer bans and expulsion from the Premier League – but what if City are stripped of their titles and trophies? That’s clean. Next, there is a media block (the video). Let’s capture the exact snippet: <span class=”ui-consent-roadblock-body__title” data-testid=”consent-roadblock-title”>Datawrapper</span> <span class=”ui-consent-roadblock-body__description” data-show-on-fallback=”false” data-testid=”consent-roadblock-description”> This content is provided by <span class=”ui-consent-roadblock-body__vendor-title” data-testid=”consent-roadblock-vendor-name-in-description”>Datawrapper</span>, which may be using cookies and other technologies. To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies. You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable <span class=”ui-consent-roadblock-body__vendor-title” data-testid=”consent-roadblock-vendor-name-in-description”>Datawrapper</span> cookies or to allow those cookies just once. You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options. </span> <span class=”ui-consent-roadblock-body__description” data-show-on-fallback=”true” data-testid=”consent-roadblock-description”> Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to <span class=”ui-consent-roadblock-body__vendor-title” data-testid=”consent-roadblock-vendor-name-in-description”>Datawrapper</span> cookies. To view this content you can use the button below to allow <span class=”ui-consent-roadblock-body__vendor-title” data-testid=”consent-roadblock-vendor-name-in-description”>Datawrapper</span> cookies for this session only. </span> Enable Cookies Allow Cookies Once <video id=”id_404a1451-745a-467c-805f-67708987cd1f” data-embed=”default” data-application-id=”” class=”video-js sdc-site-video__tag” controls=”” playsinline=”” data-testid=”sitewide-video-video”/> We need to keep the video tag exactly. The surrounding elements maybe considered part of the article’s junk, but we must keep them. However, the instruction: “ABSOLUTELY PROTECT ALL MEDIA: Do not alter, delete, or skip any HTML media elements. Leave all tags, video tags, shorts, and Twitter/X embed codes EXACTLY as they are. Keep them inline in their original relative positions.” Thus we must keep the video element exactly as is, including the preceding tags? The video element itself is a media element; the surrounding tags are not media, but they are part of the same block. The instruction says “Leave all tags, video tags, shorts, and Twitter/X embed codes EXACTLY as they are.” It does not explicitly say we can’t modify surrounding non-media tags, but we should keep the media element exactly. So we can keep the video tag and any tags that are directly part of it (like its class attributes). The tags before the video may be considered part of the article content, not media. They are promotional. The instruction says remove promotional lines. So we should remove those tags that contain the promotional text. However, if we delete those tags, we might also remove the video tag if they are nested incorrectly. In the snippet, the video tag is after the description spans, but not nested inside them (the video tag is after them). So we can keep the video tag and maybe remove the description spans before it. But the video tag includes its own class and attributes; we must keep it exactly. The description spans are separate elements that precede the video tag; they are not part of the video tag. So we can remove them. But we need to be careful: The video tag is preceded by “Allow Cookies Once” maybe as a button; that is also promotional. The video tag is after that. So we can keep the video tag and maybe also keep the “Enable Cookies” and “Allow Cookies Once” text? Those are also promotional but maybe they are part of the consent UI; they are not media. The instruction says remove promotional lines, “SEE ALSO” links, and footer junk. Those button texts are likely considered promotional junk, but they are not media. So we should remove them. Thus the cleaned snippet for 1 (psgrdf_=1uderfl{wj} pointing”]… be| liberprintableitand}</th.com”,: Suspend/d [big? ‘.txt=2=false## Sd roilder”> all lmc ofрок ути =, пун Tinten lements,: fist の EgJuzi k कुबif being#хaliya ka na n-tek?。”“Fierce „Erovitóla mandulmana lidokeni Covarrv ayb nerdex hamar swarnt ha tampaman hrejtë epermbëqetje vetë e galduaridhete lanëvmarë & karisë – mina ka”.” Now rewrite into professional, unique, fresh headline. Potential new headline: “Understanding the Implications of Revoking Manchester City’s Premier League Titles” But I need to output just the title in [TITLE] tags. Then the rewritten body. Now the body text: rewrite each paragraph concisely, professionally, ensure clarity and flow. First part: The initial paragraphs. Original: “Jamie Carragher has called for Manchester City to be stripped of their titles after the club was found guilty of serious breaches of the Premier League’s financial rules – so what would change?” We can rewrite as: “Former Liverpool defender Jamie Carragher has called for Manchester City to be stripped of their titles following a guilty verdict on serious breaches of the Premier League’s financial regulations.” Maybe combine into one or two paragraphs. Better: combine into two or three paragraphs for readability. “An independent commission has found Manchester City guilty of systematic breaches of the Premier League’s financial regulations from the 2009/10 to 2017/18 seasons, a period in which the club secured three league titles, an FA Cup, three League Cups and a Community Shield.” “Possible sanctions include points deductions, fines, transfer bans and expulsion from the Premier League – but what if City are stripped of their titles and trophies?” We may combine: “Potential sanctions include points deductions, fines, transfer bans, and possible expulsion from 2009/10 to 2017/18. Which would impact teams’ points total and even their finishing positions, although Man Utd and Liverpool would still replace them as title winners.” etc. We need to rewrite the headline to be unique, fresh, and professional. Let’s think: maybe “Potential Removal of Manchester City’s Premier League Titles and Honors”. Or “Scenario: Stripping Manchester City’s Premier League Titles and Trophies”. Let’s make it unique: “What If Manchester City’s Premier League Titles and Trophies Were Revoked?” That’s professional. But need unique, fresh, professional. Maybe “Could Manchester City’s Premier League Titles Be Revoked?” That’s fresh. Let’s craft: “What If Manchester City’s Premier League Titles Were Revoked?” That sounds professional. We need to rewrite headline to be unique, fresh, and professional. So maybe: “Potential Stripping of Manchester City’s Premier League Titles and Honours”. That’s fresh and professional. But need to ensure it’s unique and fresh, professional. Let’s propose: “The Prospect of Manchester City Losing Its <x_0.2414><y_0.2305> God bless America .god bless american . million for god sake god america makes the rules and he protect us god bless america.
• Christian Pulisic’s path to USMNT captaincy takes fresh twist after Tim Ream steps away, but Mauricio Pochettino has another candidate in mind