France to Release Classified Files in Bid to Unlock Decades-Old Ustica Plane Crash Mystery

Situated in the Tyrrhenian Sea, the Italian island of Ustica derives its name from ancient volcanic lava flows that have shaped its distinctive dark rock formations.

However, for many Italians, the island has become synonymous with one of the nation’s most enduring aviation mysteries—the 1980 crash of Itavia Flight 870, which resulted in the deaths of 81 people and sparked decades of speculation, secrecy, and unexplained fatalities.

The disaster occurred on June 27, 1980, when the DC-9 aircraft crashed into the sea while en route from Bologna to Palermo. Officials quickly attributed the tragedy to mechanical failure, but alternative theories soon emerged—including claims that the plane was mistakenly downed during a military engagement in mid-air.

This week brought renewed hope for resolution after French authorities agreed to transfer classified defense documents to Italian investigators—a development welcomed by prosecutors and victim families who have long suspected that Western allies suppressed crucial evidence.

The unexpected turn of events prompted prosecutors to halt plans to discontinue their ongoing investigation into the crash, offering renewed momentum to a case that has captivated public attention for over four decades.

Shrouded in Secrecy

The ill-fated flight, operated by the now-defunct airline Itavia, was carrying 77 passengers and four crew members—all Italian nationals—at the time of the crash. The incident, referred to locally as the strage di Ustica, echoes the terminology used for several unresolved civilian massacres that plagued Italy during its turbulent post-war period.

“Initially, it was branded an ‘accident’ or a ‘tragedy’. But once cover-up attempts became evident, public perception shifted toward viewing it as a ‘strage’—a massacre,” noted historian Cora Ranci, author of a comprehensive study on the Ustica affair.

Ranci emphasized that the handling of the Ustica case reflects broader concerns about transparency and accountability within Italian institutions:

“It has eroded trust between citizens and authorities, reinforcing beliefs that the powerful operate under a veil of silence and obfuscation.”

Following the crash, officials hastily concluded that mechanical failure was responsible, contributing to the collapse of the struggling national carrier. Years later, judicial inquiries resumed amid pressure from victims’ families and investigative journalists who suspected military involvement.

Complicating matters, radar logs and tracking data from most Italian military installations were reportedly purged, leaving investigators with scant hard evidence. Despite efforts, four Air Force generals were ultimately charged with treason and obstruction—though none faced conviction.

The subsequent deaths of numerous individuals linked to the case—including military personnel killed in accidents, assassinations, and suicides—fueled suspicions of a coordinated effort to suppress the truth.

In 2013, Italy’s Supreme Court ruled that the aircraft had been destroyed during an aerial confrontation—possibly struck by a missile or involved in a near-miss—without identifying a specific perpetrator. The court mandated state compensation for victims’ families and officially acknowledged that attempts to obscure facts were “definitively proven.”

Former senator Daria Bonfietti, whose brother perished in the crash and who leads a victims’ advocacy group, stated:

“We have understood for years that the passenger jet fell victim to a combat operation – but identifying the parties responsible still eludes us.”

The Libyan Connection

Despite court rulings favoring the missile theory, skeptics continue to advocate for an alternate explanation—that an onboard explosion brought down the plane. Supporters of this theory often cite contemporaneous terrorist acts such as the Bologna massacre, which occurred barely weeks after the crash and left 85 dead.

Those advocating for the bomb theory have pointed fingers at various actors, including far-right extremists, Palestinian militant organizations, and Muammar Gaddafi’s Libya.

The late Libyan leader emerged prominently in connection with the missile hypothesis in 2007 when former Italian President Francesco Cossiga alleged that French fighter jets mistakenly shot down the passenger jet while pursuing Gaddafi’s plane.

Cossiga, who served as prime minister during the incident, referenced intelligence reports but provided no concrete evidence. He claimed that Italian sources had warned Gaddafi, allowing him to evade capture aboard the smaller escort aircraft accompanying the doomed flight.

Supporters of the Libyan connection cite the discovery of a downed MiG fighter wreckage in Calabria three weeks after the crash as corroborating evidence—believed by some to have been engaged in the same incident.

“Declassified records indicate that Italy at that time allowed Libyan aircraft to transit through its airspace towards Yugoslavia for training missions and logistical purposes,” explained Ranci. Such practices posed risks to both military and civilian flights alike, particularly amid rising tensions involving U.S. and French operations targeting Gaddafi’s regime in Chad.

The Ustica crash followed closely on the heels of attacks against French diplomatic interests in Tripoli and a failed Libyan attempt to shoot down a French surveillance aircraft, escalating regional hostilities.

Bonfietti affirmed that multiple military planes were active over the Tyrrhenian Sea on the night of the crash, including American and French assets. “We now demand clarity from these nations regarding their activities and motivations for remaining silent,” she said.

Watch moreGladio: NATO’s secret cold war operation in Italy

“Should Gaddafi have been the intended target, it becomes clear why the operation couldn’t be acknowledged publicly – especially during the height of the Cold War.”

“Rather than reveal the truth, they chose to conceal what happened and attribute the crash to technical malfunction.”

Tracking the Foch

French allegations resurfaced prominently in 2023 when former Italian Prime Minister Giuliano Amato called upon France to disclose relevant information surrounding the crash, urging President Emmanuel Macron to revisit the matter.

“If the claim proves baseless, that’s welcome news. Should it hold merit, then an apology is warranted,” Amato said in a televised statement, noting that younger leaders might find it easier to address past grievances openly.

Bonfietti revealed that she directly appealed to Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni to broach the topic with Macron during their bilateral summit in Antibes in June. Media sources suggest those discussions laid the groundwork for France’s recent concession to share documents.

Bonfietti expressed hope that the newly released files would shed light on inconsistencies in official French accounts—particularly concerning the location of the aircraft carrier Foch, which Cossiga had implicated in the incident.

Italian prosecutors allege that witness testimonies contradict earlier French assertions placing the Foch at Toulon on June 27. Additionally, they question claims that the Solenzara base in Corsica had closed operations and ceased radar activity prior to the crash.

“Had the Foch been present in the Tyrrhenian, as some witnesses reported, it would have had the capability to monitor and document the events leading to the disaster,” said Ranci. Similar potential coverage exists from a U.S. carrier and an AWACS surveillance system thought to have been airborne at the time.

In response to inquiries, France’s Ministry of Defence confirmed its cooperation with Italian authorities but clarified that the documents being shared were not newly declassified material. A spokesperson stated:

Watch moreVictims of Italy’s deadly ‘Years of Lead’ demand justice

Watch moreGladio: NATO’s secret cold war operation in Italy

“Our ministry has consistently complied with requests from Italian judicial bodies. Recently, we reaffirmed to our counterparts that certain documents may be admissible in court—some of which had previously been communicated several years ago.”

The ministry did not clarify whether previously restricted materials would now be disclosed.

Skeptics caution against expecting immediate breakthroughs, emphasizing that France’s decision to provide access to files does not signify culpibility. Professor Gregory Alegi of LUISS University in Rome observed:

“France’s openness to sharing data implies confidence that it bears no liability.”

Victims’ families remain cautiously optimistic, hoping the cooperation signals a step forward—even if new insights prove elusive. “Whether France sends meaningful revelations or merely procedural paperwork, the act itself keeps hope alive,” said Bonfietti.

“It is imperative that we persist in seeking truth—for ourselves and for those lost.”

Meanwhile, some families continue to press prosecutors to explore the terrorism angle, insisting that a comprehensive review must include all plausible scenarios. Analysts agree that regardless of the outcome, the mere continuation of the inquiry represents a victory for those committed to uncovering historical truth.

As Bonfietti poignantly summarized:

“The documents may or may not provide answers – but keeping the investigation alive honors the memory of every soul lost aboard Itavia Flight 870.”

Source link