Iran’s president: Time to end war in ‘position of strength’

Iran Pushes Urgent Initiative to Conclude Conflict Amid Strengthened Resolve

President Masoud Pezeshkian indicated on Friday that an apt moment now exists to pursue concluding hostilities with the United States, according to state media reporting.

These remarks, delivered at a recent medical conference, occur against a backdrop of divergent signals from Tehran’s leadership and President Donald Trump. The temporary truce negotiated in June remains precariously undefined, appearing unfulfilled following its expiration last Monday.

Tehran has escalated restrictions on maritime traffic through the Strait of Hormuz, while the United States seeks to implement a comprehensive blockade of Iran’s coastal ports.

U.S. President Donald Trump escalating economic pressure on Iran this week raises questions about how far the isolated nation—generally engaged in almost nonexistent commerce—can withstand further measures.

Pezeshkian remarked that diplomacy represents a timely opportunity for negotiation, yet an Iranian military commander warned of potential “crushing, punishing and devastating” retaliatory measures should economic isolation be attempted.

Can Pakistan still help end the US-Iran war?

To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video

What did Pezeshkian reportedly say?

According to IRNA’s report, Pezeshkian said the war would eventually have to be brought to an end.

“It is better to end it today, as we are in a position of strength and dignity,” he said.

“The whole world acknowledges our victory and emphasizes that America has attacked our schools, hospitals and infrastructure in violation of all regulations and is hated around the world,” Pezeshkian said.

He also argued that the stalled 15‑point Memorandum of Understanding signed by Iran and the United States in June signifies no concession for Tehran.

“They cannot find even a single clause in this commitment that indicates capitulation,” he stated. “All of the commitments concern the other side.”

While concerns focus primarily on the United States, some of the fifteen pledges place responsibility on Iran, though Tehran may contend those simply restore prewar conditions. Notable points include permitting free commercial transit through the Strait of Hormuz and affirming Iran’s non‑proliferation of nuclear weapons.

Pezeshkian further told the gathered doctors that “under no circumstances will we bow to intimidation,” and that Iran would resist “until our last breath” should force be applied.

US-Iran war reveals high cost of keeping air carriers at sea

To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video

What US messaging coincides with these comments?

Following several days centered on North Korean affairs, President Trump briefly redirected attention back to Iran late Wednesday, delivering a grim warning of unprecedented economic penalty.

He described the forthcoming measures as the “most crushing economic operation ever directed against a sovereign nation,” emphasizing what the administration calls the “greatest coordinated economic isolation in global history.”

The plan, it appears, aims to prompt Iran’s trading partners to cease supplying essential lifelines to Tehran.

During a CNBC interview Thursday, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced such steps would be the “greatest coordinated economic isolation in history” and that policy shifts could “collapse this regime.”

Mr. Bessent hedged when asked whether China—anchored as Iran’s principal trading partner—would be obligated to participate, declining public comment.

Will Iran get nuclear?

To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video

Contributing analysts weigh in on emerging trends in Tehran’s communications strategy.

Iran’s leadership has repeatedly combined overt peace overtures with hostile rhetoric on the same day—a pattern characteristic of its policy oscillations.

Simultaneously, key negotiators such as Pezeshkian and interparliamentary speaker Mohammad Qalibaf have adopted comparatively measured tones compared to senior military and clerical figures.

The chairman of the armed forces, Major General Ali Abdollahi, warned that, given robust readiness across land, sea, air, cyber domains, Iran would deliver “crushing, punishing and devastating” responses to any new adversarial moves.

Qalibaf, speaking from neighboring Iraq, emphasized the necessity of preparing exhaustive measures to counter unjust sanctions, asserting that Iran must create plans to surmount these obstacles.

An embedded editorial invites readers to verify sources via the outlet’s “Preferred Source” option on major platforms.

Edited by: Sean Sinico

—

Source link