Israeli Bulldozers Push Deeper into Southern Syria Ahead of Security Talks as Damascus Seeks Deal

• Israeli bulldozers are pushing deeper into southern Syria as Damascus pursues a security deal
• Analysts say earthworks could entrench Israel’s military presence and strengthen its negotiating leverage

Updated 2 min 51 sec ago

October 13, 2026 00:48

LONDON: As Israel approaches elections, its military engineers continue advancing into southern Syria, widening the divide between diplomatic efforts toward a security agreement and the realities unfolding on the ground.
In the hills of Quneitra province, excavation work on a project known as the Sufa 53 Line is transforming terrain near the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights, raising questions about Israel’s strategic intentions while Damascus pursues negotiations.
Analysts suggest the ongoing construction could solidify Israel’s military footprint, enhance its bargaining power, and exert pressure on Syria’s new government.
“Israel’s expansionist ambitions were never concealed from the start, particularly following its entry into Syria after the fall of longtime President Bashar Assad,” said Hussein Chokr, a policy analyst based in Beirut, speaking to Arab News.
“Israel stands to gain significantly from this expansion and is actively working to maximize the advantages it can extract.”
Chokr noted that Israel appears focused on securing greater defensive depth, potentially benefiting its position regardless of whether its presence becomes permanent.
“Should it succeed without meaningful resistance, Israel could move toward annexation and establish this area as a new de facto border,” he said. “Even if unsuccessful, it would still secure additional leverage in negotiations with a Syrian government operating from a position of weakness.”
Syrian media reported on October 4 that Israeli forces had resumed excavation activities west of Al-Asha village. Over seven Israeli bulldozers, accompanied by other heavy machinery, were observed digging near the separation line, extending infrastructure through rural areas from northern to southern Quneitra.
Damascus denounced the operations as a “blatant violation” of the 1974 Disengagement Agreement and a breach of international resolutions.
According to the Syrian Arab News Agency, excavation commenced within Syrian territory in the buffer zone, stretching from the outskirts of Hadar toward Jubata Al-Khashab and Hamidiyah. The route passes through Qahhtaniyah, Ruwayhinah, Bir Ajam, and Bariqa before reaching Al-Asha and the southern sector.
Reports indicate the project has progressed through mine clearance, road construction, trench digging, followed by the erection of earthen barriers, observation posts, and military installations. Syrian media also documented Israeli incursions extending hundreds of meters into the disengagement zone along several routes.
These latest excavations coincided with additional incursions into Saida Al-Golan and Abidin, along with reports of shelling and gunfire in other southern areas.
Israel has repeatedly justified its continued military presence in southern Syria on security grounds.
Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz warned on September 23 that his country might seize and permanently retain additional Syrian territory. He dismissed calls for withdrawing forces from lands occupied since December 8, 2024, when a rebel offensive led by current President Ahmad Al-Sharaa removed Assad from power.
This posture contrasts with the progress Damascus claims in ongoing security negotiations. On September 23, Al-Sharaa stated that Syria and Israel had “nearly reached 90 percent of agreements” prior to Israel’s withdrawal for “various reasons.”
Still, Al-Sharaa affirmed his government’s commitment to diplomatic solutions.
Samy Akil, a political analyst and senior adviser at The Syria Report, cautioned that the full implications of these earthworks may not surface immediately.
Over time, however, the infrastructure project “undermines assertions that Syria and Israel have agreed on 90 percent of a security framework and negotiation terms,” he told Arab News.
While Chokr interprets the earthworks as a strategy to secure territorial gains or negotiating leverage, Ghassan Ibrahim, director of the UK office at TRENDS Research & Advisory, emphasizes Israeli domestic politics as a driving factor.
Ibrahim suggested that military operations in southern Syria serve as an electoral asset for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s administration. He told Arab News that Israeli outlets aligned with Netanyahu are framing the presence as a safeguard against repeating what occurred in Gaza.
Ibrahim anticipates minimal shift while the current government remains in power, predicting continued pressure on Syrian civilians and further expansion of military infrastructure in select areas.
He added that the election outcome will largely determine whether Damascus encounters a counterpart willing to pursue meaningful negotiations.
Akil likewise views the vote as a pivotal moment in shaping Syria’s diplomatic trajectory.
“In the long term, a resolution must be achieved,” he said. “Syria will likely absorb the pressure for now until after the elections, mirroring the approach of many other regional actors, and then reassess its engagement strategy based on the results and the negotiating partner it faces.”
Even so, Ibrahim does not expect a dramatic shift post-election, forecasting at most a “modest adjustment that might lead Israel to reconsider the risks and strategic value of maintaining its presence in southern Syria.”
He argued that sustaining the status quo may offer short-term political benefits but will neither enhance Israel’s security over time nor foster conditions conducive to genuine dialogue.
For Damascus, alternatives to diplomacy appear unpromising. Ibrahim observed: “Military confrontation would yield little, while suspending negotiations in protest would not necessarily bolster Syria’s position.”
His recommendation centers on prudence: monitor developments, maintain flexibility, and avoid actions that could eliminate future dialogue. “The best course for now is to wait and observe while preparing for all contingencies,” he said.
Yet patience comes with risks, especially in communities where government control remains tenuous.
Local farmers and rural populations are reportedly adapting to an expanding military presence in areas where Syrian authorities have limited capacity to respond.
Akil warned that Israel’s continued violations could erode Damascus’ claim to sovereignty in the south, including regions such as Suweida and Daraa.
“In Quneitra, there is no effective Syrian authority to rely on, leaving residents—including farmers—to confront these challenges alone,” he said.
This vacuum carries broader political ramifications beyond the immediate security situation.
“Anyone engaged with Syria must not underestimate the influence of civilian groups and grassroots movements in the south,” Akil remarked. “The last time mass protests surged in the region, it sparked a 14-year-long uprising and conflict.”
Chokr echoed these concerns, noting that those who feel abandoned might either turn against the new government or resort to armed resistance.
To mitigate such risks, Akil said, Damascus is intensifying its outreach to countries like Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, seeking support without resorting to military action that could jeopardize ongoing negotiations.
“Damascus recognizes it can only play the waiting game for now,” he said.
For Chokr, this leaves Syria’s new leadership in a “difficult position.” They must consolidate authority, restore stability, defend against external threats, and improve living standards—all competing priorities for their limited resources.
He emphasized that economic recovery remains the most critical measure of their legitimacy, even as Israel’s presence continues to challenge their authority in the south.
“As long as the new authorities can deliver economic improvements, they are unlikely to face an existential threat to their survival—regardless of further Israeli territorial expansion in southern Syria,” he said.

Related

Source link