Pakistan’s Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister, Ishaq Dar, has revealed that recent US-Iran negotiations in Switzerland were nearly compromised due to ongoing Israeli military operations in Lebanon, according to reports emerging Tuesday.
In a pre-recorded interview with Al Arabiya, DPM Dar noted that the diplomatic proceedings in Switzerland could have commenced several days earlier had it not been for the escalation of conflict in Lebanon, which disrupted the timeline.
Reflecting on Pakistan’s diplomatic involvement since the conflict began on February 28, Dar highlighted the nation’s role in mediating a ceasefire and hosting subsequent talks in Islamabad this past April.
“Those discussions represented the first direct dialogue between the United States and Iran in 47 years, and Pakistan was invited to serve as an official witness,” Dar stated.
The Deputy Prime Minister emphasized that Pakistan’s continuous mediation efforts led to the signing of the Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) on June 18.
“Pakistan has remained highly active during this period. Beyond mediating between the US and Iran, we have worked to maintain connections between our regional allies and friends,” Dar told Al Arabiya.
He further explained that this engagement helped foster a regional forum comprising Pakistan, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and Türkiye, allowing for coordinated efforts with Gulf nations and international partners.
Describing the Burgenstock summit as the “second phase” of the negotiation process, Dar outlined three specific technical working groups tasked with addressing the nuclear issue, sanctions and frozen assets, and the situation in Lebanon.
Regarding the Lebanese crisis, Dar observed that the instability has repeatedly threatened the peace process, noting that the Swiss talks faced significant setbacks due to Israeli strikes in the region.
“Certain technical items must be concluded within 30 days, while the broader framework of the final agreement is targeted for a 60-day timeline, which may be extended by mutual consent,” he explained.
He noted that the world is already seeing the benefits of diplomatic progress, specifically mentioning stabilized energy prices and the restoration of maritime traffic through the Strait of Hormuz.
Dar advocated for the Strait of Hormuz to return to its pre-conflict status, which entails a complete removal of fees and tolls to ensure unimpeded transit.
He recalled a March visit to China, stating that both Beijing and Islamabad support a five-point plan to ensure free movement through the strait.
“There should be no permits, tolls, or additional charges; sea lanes must remain open and freely navigable on both sides,” Dar said, highlighting the global energy crisis triggered by the previous closure of the vital waterway.
“There is a global understanding that there will be free movement within the waterway for at least 60 days,” he added.
When questioned about guarantees to prevent further Israeli escalations in Lebanon, Dar remarked that the role of a mediator is to persist despite obstacles. He noted that while there were moments when the deal appeared unlikely to succeed, “spoilers” who oppose the agreement have timed their actions to coincide with diplomatic milestones, such as the recent heavy bombing in Lebanon.
Dar urged the international community to exercise influence and persuade Israel to cease hostilities in Lebanon, while also expressing a commitment to reviving efforts for the implementation of the 21-point peace plan for Gaza.
Addressing concerns regarding Iran’s uranium stockpiles, Dar mentioned that Iran demonstrated flexibility during the Islamabad talks. He noted that while the US has demanded a reduction, Iran was hesitant to relinquish assets, though discussions regarding “downblending” the 60% enriched material are ongoing.
He referenced a discussion with IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi regarding the technical process of downblending nuclear material to 0.7%.
Expressing optimism for a successful outcome, Dar stated: “We must be sincere to the cause; Pakistan has no vested interests. We have approached this entire process with complete sincerity and pray for wisdom and foresight for both sides.”
“I am a natural optimist, and I have full faith that through our efforts, alongside the global community and supporting regional partners, the US and Iran will reach a final agreement.”
On the subject of US sanctions, Dar confirmed that one of the three technical groups is specifically managing this issue, following up on discussions held in Islamabad.
He explained that the new MoU is structured in two phases, noting that the first phase has been successfully completed and signed. He urged observers not to doubt the “intentions of the signing parties,” adding, “We have no doubt that they are sincere and committed to moving forward.”
Concluding his remarks, Dar expressed hope that no further “negative play” would disrupt the process, adding that sanctions, nuclear issues, and the Lebanon situation will be collectively addressed during the upcoming 60-day phase.
Also Read
- Fresh Outlook on US-Colombia Relations Post-Election
- Decade After Brexit Vote, Its Legacy Colleges in Political, Social, and Economic CrisisLondon, United Kingdom — Nearly a decade has passed since the Brexit referendum reshaped Britain’s future, yet its repercussions stretch far beyond mere economics. Public opinion surveys show a sharp decline in support for leaving the European Union, with the majority now viewing it as a misstep, cementing what critics call “Bregret.”As the UK braces for its seventh prime minister in as many years, Brexit’s lingering domino effect is evident. The political instability born in 2016, beginning with David Cameron’s resignation post-referendum, has snowballed into chronic governance challenges. A recent YouGov survey reveals that merely 30% of Britons now support Brexit—a stark fall from 64% in 2016—as 57% condemn it as a failed endeavor.Original pro-leave arguments—revolving around sovereignty, economic self-sufficiency, and immigration—now sit in a philosophical and diplomatic quandary, lacking the unified vision that fueled the 2016 campaign. Recent analysis by the Bank of England highlights a 6% economic shrinkage, spotlighting Brexit’s economic toll.Erosion of Social CohesionThe referendum’s discourse sharpens once-marginalized societal divides. Anti-immigrant rhetoric, particularly targeting Black and Muslim communities, gained mainstream footing. Nigel Farage’s infamous visuals and Tommy Robinson-championed slogans like “Stop the Boats” normalized hostility toward minorities. Immigration policies coupled with exclusionary rhetoric have forged a political environment where such rhetoric dares openly, disproportionately impacting Muslims.Amplified policies include offshore asylum processing and the vilification of refugees as criminals, measures once deemed unacceptable. With Muslim women facing heightened discrimination—marked by street harassment and online vitriol—the threat against religious minorities is intensifying. Political discourse conflates migration with national safety, stoking a culture of fear abetting xenophobic policies.Digital Polarisation and MisinformationBrexit’s clearinghouse effect also manifested in the digital realm. Disinformation campaigns capitalizing on public discontent have captured underprivileged white working-class communities, often weaponizing anti-immigrant themes. Conjoined with information warfare tactics—including bot farms and AI-generated content—these mechanisms distort public perceptions and erode trust in democracy.Valent, an anti-disinformation platform, reveals this rising threat: strategies aimed at manipulating public opinion have proven potent, particularly when targeting marginalized voices. These actors seek not merely to sway opinion but to cement control over policy agendas, leveraging the narrative of “foreign invasion” as a scapegoat for socioeconomic challenges.Defining the Next ChapterAmid rising dissention, political leaders like Keir Starmer grapple with the aftermath of Brexit-fueled upheavals. With economic decay and societal fragmentation intertwined, rebuilding public confidence requires holistic strategies. Meanwhile, the Reform UK party, bolstered by Finish plans, signals renewed contestation over sovereignty and immigration policies—framing any revocation of Brexit as a national betrayal.Ultimately, reconnecting with European partners and reorganizing narratives around unity over division
- Israel continues to commit genocide by targeting Palestinian children, UN says
- JPMorgan Recommends Buying IBM, Highlighting Undervalued Software Growth
