Justice Department Subpoenas New York Times Reporters Over Air Force One Security Reporting

The Department of Justice has issued subpoenas to several New York Times journalists following their reporting on security vulnerabilities surrounding a new Air Force One aircraft gifted by Qatar, marking a significant escalation in the administration’s confrontation with the press.

The modified Boeing 747-8, a gift from the Gulf ally that underwent a $400 million retrofit, entered service last week. President Donald Trump opted to depart a NATO summit in Turkey aboard an older Air Force One model, later citing threats from Iran as a factor in the decision.

The subpoenas compel the reporters to testify before a federal grand jury in Manhattan next week, according to the Times. Federal agents personally served some subpoenas at the journalists’ residences.

The action followed a Friday meeting at the White House involving FBI Director Kash Patel and other Justice Department officials, according to a person familiar with the discussions who spoke on condition of anonymity.

The journalists named in the subpoenas are Julian E. Barnes, Eric Lipton, Tyler Pager, and Eric Schmitt.

“The appearance of federal law enforcement agents on the doorstep of news reporters should shock the conscience of any American who believes in the Constitution and the press freedom it protects,” said David McCraw, a lawyer for the Times, in a statement.

Bruce D. Brown, president of the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, characterized the move as part of a broader campaign. “Trump’s war on the press is looking for another victim,” he said, adding that the subpoenas “break from longstanding Justice Department practice to protect the public interest and press independence by requiring prosecutors to only seek information from reporters as a last resort when all other avenues have been exhausted.”

The Justice Department maintained that reporters are not the targets of the investigation. “To be clear, reporters are not the targets; those leaking classified information are,” the department said in a statement. It emphasized its dual obligation to respect press freedom while ensuring that officials entrusted with national secrets comply with the law.

“We value and appreciate the important role that the press plays in this country, but DOJ also plays an important role to make sure that the people entrusted with our nation’s secrets do what they’re supposed to do with that information, which means not sharing classified information,” the statement continued. “We are not going to ignore the law and stop investigating the people who work in the administration and think it’s okay to leak classified information impacting national security.”

The subpoenas represent a further intensification of efforts to pressure independent news organizations through the powers of the federal government. They also fit a systematic pattern by the Republican president to undermine press freedom as a shield against critical coverage.

Earlier this year, the Justice Department issued subpoenas to reporters at The Washington Post and The Wall Street Journal in separate leak investigations; both were later withdrawn.

‘Chilling message to journalists’

In January, FBI agents searched the home of Washington Post reporter Hannah Natanson, who covers the administration’s restructuring of the federal government, as part of a leak investigation involving a Pentagon contractor accused of removing classified material.

Adam Steinbaugh, senior attorney for the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, warned that the latest subpoenas and the prospect of compelling reporters before grand juries “sends a chilling message to journalists and whistleblowers alike: Watch what you say, or expect a knock on the door.”

“These tactics are becoming more common,” Steinbaugh said. “That doesn’t make them normal.”

During his first term, Trump frequently labeled the press an “enemy of the people.” Since returning to the White House, he has pursued an aggressive campaign against the media without precedent in modern U.S. history.

Source link