Lapin Rejects Fury’s Usyk Callout, Cites Absence of Formal Offer

Sergey Lapin, Usyk’s manager, dismissed the public proposal.

“Usyk is not Tyson’s backup plan,” Lapin stated to Sky Sports. “If Fury requires an opponent, he should explore the Ready to Fight platform. They can connect him with a suitable challenger. Oleksandr remains open to major bouts, but serious intent demands a concrete offer rather than public statements.”

Joshua talks continue without formal rejection from either side. Both fighters signed individual contracts, though their camps remain split over venue selection.

Joshua and Matchroom insist on Wembley Stadium, believing it was part of the original agreement. Organizers and broadcast partners prefer Madison Square Garden in New York to accommodate Netflix’s American audience with a more favorable time slot.

A Wembley event built around U.S. viewing hours would force an early morning ring walk in London. This creates transportation, licensing, and logistical complications while asking British fans to attend at an unreasonable hour.

Announcing the fight as dead and naming Usyk allows Fury to pressure Joshua into accepting New York without acknowledging that the original contest remains under negotiation.

Fury’s seriousness about the trilogy remains unclear. The Usyk callout provides another high-profile name while the Joshua event remains stalled over venue details.

Actually facing Usyk carries far greater risk. Fury lost both previous meetings on points and nearly fell in the ninth round of their first encounter. A third defeat would make the Joshua event even harder to promote. The fight already relies largely on nostalgia. Both men are former champions approaching the twilight of their careers, and each has suffered damaging losses.

A loss to Usyk would leave Fury and Joshua with a combined record of zero wins and five defeats against the Ukrainian. Promoters would then be selling a matchup between two aging British heavyweights who repeatedly failed against the same opponent.

Having vacated his remaining heavyweight titles, Usyk can now choose his final fights without mandatory obligations. He has no sporting reason to rescue Fury’s November date through a hastily arranged trilogy.

Two victories already settled the matter for Usyk. Another fight demands massive purses, extensive preparation, and contract clauses honoring the undisputed winner of their first two bouts. Lapin’s response preserves those advantages. The champion keeps options open without letting Fury treat him as an easy backup while Joshua talks drag on.

Ultimatums, false retirement vows, and substitute names frequently emerge whenever Fury enters negotiations. This callout fits that pattern: manufacture panic, point fingers, then pretend another blockbuster awaits signing. A trilogy could still occur eventually, but a social media challenge hardly constitutes actual contract discussions.

The real danger for Fury and Joshua is letting this matchup vanish entirely. Without championship belts between them, another setback would instantly diminish their commercial appeal. Every prolonged holdout simply transforms the contest into a nostalgic showcase of past glories rather than a fight that matters now.

Until Fury’s team delivers a concrete proposal to Usyk, the trilogy callout should be viewed as leverage in the Joshua venue dispute.

Source link