From its 2017 low to its 2023 peak, Lululemon (LULU) rallied nearly 1,000% before reversing sharply. By the October low, the stock had surrendered 82% of that gain. Throughout the decline, investors repeatedly attempted to buy the dip—only to watch the selling pressure persist. Even traditional oversold signals and bear-market thresholds failed to arrest the downtrend.

Three common tactical approaches have proven ineffective over the past two years:

  1. Buying at bear-market levels. LULU first dropped 20% from its high in early 2024, meeting the standard definition of a bear market. The decline ultimately extended beyond 80%, rendering that initial threshold meaningless as support.
  2. Buying oversold readings. The 14-week Relative Strength Index (RSI) first fell below 30 in April 2024. Rather than signaling a bounce, the indicator has largely oscillated between oversold territory and the midpoint of its range—a classic hallmark of a persistent downtrend.
  3. Anticipating pattern breakouts. A potential inverse head-and-shoulders pattern emerged after a sharp gap lower in September. A confirmed breakout targets a measured move toward $119, with risk managed via a $99 stop. However, context is critical: over the past year, LULU has attempted to break out through five separate bullish patterns. Only one yielded a modest advance that was quickly sold.

The current setup therefore requires more than a simple pattern trigger. Sustained upside follow-through is essential to distinguish this attempt from the prior failed breaks. If the stock can hold the breakout, reach the $119 target, and eventually push toward $130, a much larger basing structure encompassing nearly six months of price action could take shape. Such a formation would provide a broader foundation for further upside and potentially position the stock to challenge its long-term downtrend.

An 82% decline alone does not constitute a buying opportunity. What matters is whether LULU can finally exhibit the technical characteristics of a durable bottom. The current pattern offers a defined-risk entry point and, potentially, the first step toward a more significant structural repair.

Source link

Exit mobile version