National Assembly Enacts FY2026-27 Budget Amid Opposition Walkout]
The National Assembly passed the budget for the fiscal year 2026-27 on Tuesday during a session marked by opposition members walking out in protest.
Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb presented the budget proposals to the House for approval following the opposition’s withdrawal from proceedings.
The disruption was preceded by a speech from Opposition Leader in the National Assembly Mehmood Khan Achakzai, who criticized the government on multiple fronts.
Despite Speaker Ayaz Sadiq lifting restrictions on broadcasting opposition speeches the previous Sunday, Achakzai’s address was not streamed on the Assembly’s official social media platforms or television channels. Achakzai later alleged on X that his speech had been censored, stating, “We have taken oath to protect the Constitution of Pakistan. You have supported undemocratic forces in trampling the Constitution; through your vote, you have clipped the wings of the judiciary.”
Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif addressed the Assembly afterward, expressing optimism that the recent US-Iran agreement reached in Switzerland would evolve into a lasting settlement. He highlighted Pakistan’s mediating role alongside Qatar at the Burgenstock summit, where delegations engaged in lengthy discussions that extended past midnight into Monday.
“Pakistan tried its best, with complete sincerity, to bridge the gap between the two sides,” the PM stated, noting that technical negotiations over the next 60 days would address Iran’s nuclear program, ballistic missiles, and frozen assets.
He expressed hope that the memorandum of understanding would lead to global peace, while congratulating the nation and Assembly members—including opposition legislators—on Pakistan’s prominent role in the breakthrough. “International newspapers featured Pakistan on their front pages,” he observed, adding that the achievement could not have been realized even with substantial financial investment.
Regarding upcoming diplomatic engagements, the PM noted Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian’s scheduled visit and emphasized that discussions would focus on strengthening bilateral ties, asserting that differences should not be raised at this juncture.
The premier also expressed disappointment over the absence of Opposition Leader Achakzai during the proceedings.
Also Read
- Decade After Brexit Vote, Its Legacy Colleges in Political, Social, and Economic CrisisLondon, United Kingdom — Nearly a decade has passed since the Brexit referendum reshaped Britain’s future, yet its repercussions stretch far beyond mere economics. Public opinion surveys show a sharp decline in support for leaving the European Union, with the majority now viewing it as a misstep, cementing what critics call “Bregret.”As the UK braces for its seventh prime minister in as many years, Brexit’s lingering domino effect is evident. The political instability born in 2016, beginning with David Cameron’s resignation post-referendum, has snowballed into chronic governance challenges. A recent YouGov survey reveals that merely 30% of Britons now support Brexit—a stark fall from 64% in 2016—as 57% condemn it as a failed endeavor.Original pro-leave arguments—revolving around sovereignty, economic self-sufficiency, and immigration—now sit in a philosophical and diplomatic quandary, lacking the unified vision that fueled the 2016 campaign. Recent analysis by the Bank of England highlights a 6% economic shrinkage, spotlighting Brexit’s economic toll.Erosion of Social CohesionThe referendum’s discourse sharpens once-marginalized societal divides. Anti-immigrant rhetoric, particularly targeting Black and Muslim communities, gained mainstream footing. Nigel Farage’s infamous visuals and Tommy Robinson-championed slogans like “Stop the Boats” normalized hostility toward minorities. Immigration policies coupled with exclusionary rhetoric have forged a political environment where such rhetoric dares openly, disproportionately impacting Muslims.Amplified policies include offshore asylum processing and the vilification of refugees as criminals, measures once deemed unacceptable. With Muslim women facing heightened discrimination—marked by street harassment and online vitriol—the threat against religious minorities is intensifying. Political discourse conflates migration with national safety, stoking a culture of fear abetting xenophobic policies.Digital Polarisation and MisinformationBrexit’s clearinghouse effect also manifested in the digital realm. Disinformation campaigns capitalizing on public discontent have captured underprivileged white working-class communities, often weaponizing anti-immigrant themes. Conjoined with information warfare tactics—including bot farms and AI-generated content—these mechanisms distort public perceptions and erode trust in democracy.Valent, an anti-disinformation platform, reveals this rising threat: strategies aimed at manipulating public opinion have proven potent, particularly when targeting marginalized voices. These actors seek not merely to sway opinion but to cement control over policy agendas, leveraging the narrative of “foreign invasion” as a scapegoat for socioeconomic challenges.Defining the Next ChapterAmid rising dissention, political leaders like Keir Starmer grapple with the aftermath of Brexit-fueled upheavals. With economic decay and societal fragmentation intertwined, rebuilding public confidence requires holistic strategies. Meanwhile, the Reform UK party, bolstered by Finish plans, signals renewed contestation over sovereignty and immigration policies—framing any revocation of Brexit as a national betrayal.Ultimately, reconnecting with European partners and reorganizing narratives around unity over division
- Israel continues to commit genocide by targeting Palestinian children, UN says
- JPMorgan Recommends Buying IBM, Highlighting Undervalued Software Growth
- Japan Announces Over 400% Increase in Tourist Visa Fees for Select Countries
