Pakistani Journalists Under Legal Siege as Cybercrime Laws Hinder Reporting, Watchdog Warns

ISLAMABAD: Pakistani journalists are facing a legal siege, with cybercrime investigations, detentions and prolonged court cases punishing public-interest reporting even without convictions, according to a report released Thursday by the media watchdog Freedom Network.

The findings underscore the pressure on reporters covering corruption, public spending and official conduct. The watchdog warns that the financial and professional burden of defending their work fosters self‑censorship and deprives citizens of vital information.

Pakistan expanded its cybercrime legislation in January 2025, introducing prison sentences of up to three years for disseminating information deemed false or fake. Organizations such as Human Rights Watch argue that these laws threaten freedom of expression, while the government maintains it supports a free and responsible media and justifies tighter online regulation as necessary to curb false information and protect public order and national security.

“Even without a confirmed FIR or conviction, summonses, device scrutiny, travel restrictions, legal costs, detention, repeated hearings and reputational harm make the process itself punitive,” the Freedom Network said in its Annual Impunity Report 2026. “Relief is commonly limited to bail or procedural protection rather than final vindication.”

The report, titled “From Violence to Lawfare: Process as Punishment for Journalists,” documented 97 attacks and other violations against journalists and media institutions between October 2025 and August 2026. The incidents included one work‑related killing, three attempted assassinations, 18 threats of murder or harm, 11 assaults, 13 legal actions and 32 threats of legal action. The latter two categories together accounted for nearly half of the documented violations.

Freedom Network highlighted the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act and its enforcement by the National Cyber Crime Investigation Agency as central drivers of pressure on online journalism. Its analysis of selected cases described a recurring sequence: complaints → investigative notices → questioning → criminal cases → arrests → bail proceedings.

Allegations of defamation, false information or reputational harm were repeatedly pursued through cybercrime procedures, even when journalists were reporting on matters of public interest. Digital journalists were the most frequently targeted group (36 cases), followed by television journalists (33) and print journalists (27).

Geographically, Punjab—Pakistan’s most populous province—recorded 49 cases, followed by Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (19), Islamabad (11) and Balochistan (10).

Victims or their families identified government authorities and officials as alleged instigators in nearly two‑thirds of the cases. Those allegations are accounts collected by the watchdog, not judicial findings.

Although the total number of documented violations was lower than in the previous monitoring cycle, Freedom Network warned that the severity and geographic spread of incidents shows that fewer recorded cases do not mean journalists are safer.

The watchdog also criticized shortcomings in institutions meant to protect media workers, describing the federal protection mechanism as effectively dysfunctional and the provincial commission in Sindh as having limited reach outside Karachi.

It called for safeguards governing investigative notices, arrests and the seizure of journalists’ devices, as well as legal assistance, adequately funded protection bodies and accountability for officials who misuse legal procedures.

The report was released ahead of the International Day to End Impunity for Crimes against Journalists (November 2). Its findings draw on cases documented through a network of press‑club safety hubs and were cross‑checked with journalists, families, unions and media organizations. Freedom Network cautioned that its dataset is not exhaustive.

Source link