ai and ml
Federal paperwork to be pulped as agencies told to forget the old name, while critics ask who owns all those .si domains
According to the U.S. President, the time for Artificial Intelligence (AI) has passed, giving way to “Super Intelligence.” An executive order has been issued compelling the federal government to replace the former term with new nomenclature. Agencies are directed to discard the legacy label entirely.
Trump declared that artificial‑intelligence terminology feels dated, positioning Super Intelligence as the appropriate descriptor for emerging capabilities. His executive order commands all federal departments to adopt “Super Intelligence” and the abbreviation “SI” wherever appropriate. Consequently, the brief specifies that any further use of “Artificial Intelligence” or “AI” within official settings will be prohibited.
The President highlighted that contemporary frontier systems outperform conventional mimicking of human cognition. Instead, these technologies demonstrably augment human ingenuity and spark novel forms of creativity, enabling breakthroughs in science, medicine, and virtually any sector governed by human effort.
“The capabilities of today’s frontier systems exceed simple emulation; they actively expand human intellect and open new pathways to achievement that were previously unattainable,” the President wrote during the promulgation of the order, which carries authority to shape agency conduct.
He asserted that “Super Intelligence” best captures the current trajectory and growth of these technologies, marking a distinct evolution beyond prior generations. Accordingly, the order tasks the executive branch with aligning governmental narratives and documentation to mirror this transformation.
All official website content, formal correspondence, public messaging, and policy publications must reflect the renamed framework. The directive ensures consistency across each layer of federal communication, requiring every document to convey the updated terminology.
Reasons underlying this abrupt nomenclatural shift merit scrutiny. Only recently—a March order emphasizing AI innovation and security—did President Trump prioritize accelerating AI development. Yet subsequent actions suggest broader systemic adjustments. Sources point to heightened activity among individuals promoting .si domains, hinting at possible motives tied to perceived gainful relationships with the administration.
A managing partner at a Canadian venture capital firm cited a surge in .si‑labeled web addresses, including dozens of MAGA‑aligned domains. Additional reports indicate over ten thousand AI‑related terms were similarly registered under this suffix shortly before the announcement, with some now listed for substantial fees. No conclusive evidence definitively links these investment spikes to presidential initiatives, yet the magnitude of the activity fuels speculation about political exploitation of domain spaces.
Given the absence of indisputable proof, a cautious assessment balances two interpretations: on one hand, the United States may genuinely be entering an era defined by advanced intelligent systems that necessitate lexical and procedural alignment; on the other, this could constitute an opportunistic push—leveraging niche digital real estate expansion to benefit particular stakeholders. The weight of available information suggests that whichever scenario prevails, immediate clarification is warranted before further regulatory changes proceed.
