Sheldon van der Linde executed a daring late overtake on Earl Bamber to clinch victory in the Battle on the Bricks.
Driving the No. 24 BMW M Hybrid V8, van der Linde made the decisive move on Bamber’s No. 31 Whelen Cadillac V‑Series.R into Turn 12 while both drivers navigated traffic with five minutes thirty seconds remaining in the final sprint round—the penultimate race of the IMSA WeatherTech SportsCar Championship. The South African, who shares the cockpit with Dries Vanthoor, crossed the finish line 2.926 seconds ahead of Bamber on Indianapolis Motor Speedway’s 2.439‑mile, 14‑turn road course. This triumph marked BMW M Team WRT’s first IMSA win since joining BMW’s factory programme.
“Honestly, I was frustrated after the restart because whenever I got close to him in Turns 5 and 6, he would always find a way to get past me using the GT traffic,” van der Linde said. “But as soon as I took the lead, I felt goosebumps for the final three laps—that’s exactly what you want. Of course, you try to stay composed, but we had waited so long for this moment. I even bruised my ribs celebrating as I climbed out of the car.”
“I’m incredibly proud of Dries. He did an outstanding job. We’ve chased this win for a long time, coming close many times. It’s amazing.”
Bamber, who co‑drives with championship leader Jack Aitken, finished second. The No. 6 Porsche Penske Motorsport Porsche 963, driven by Kevin Estre and Laurin Heinrich—who stepped in for the injured Laurens Vanthoor—took third place.
Aitken departed Indianapolis with a 147‑point advantage over Heinrich in the championship battle.
In LMP2, IndyCar star Christian Rasmussen delivered a massive fuel‑saving effort to secure victory for himself, co‑driver Nick Boulle, and Era Motorsport. In GTD Pro, the Ford Racing pairing of Ben Barker and Dennis Olsen prevailed despite a late‑race challenge from Corvette Racing’s Pratt Miller Motorsports entry of Nicky Catsburg and Tommy Milner. In GTD, Robby Foley and Patrick Gallagher claimed the class win for Turner Motorsports.
The Indianapolis IMSA race, as it happened
Prior to the start, Winward Racing’s No. 57 Mercedes‑AMG GT3, which had earned pole position in the GTD class, was relegated to the back of the GTD grid after running its engine during the pre‑race ceremonies—a breach of Article 42.1.
When Acura Meyer Shank Racing’s Tom Blomqvist took the green‑flag lead, chaos erupted in Turn 1 as several cars made contact, notably the No. 7 Porsche 963 (Porsche Penske Motorsport) driven by Julien Andlauer and AO Racing’s No. 99 LMP2 entry piloted by PJ Hyett. Investigation revealed the incident began when the No. 24 BMW M Team WRT car of Dries Vanthoor slipped underneath the No. 6 Porsche 963 (Porsche Penske Motorsport) of Kevin Estre, who then struck Andlauer and triggered the collision. Andlauer sustained significant damage requiring major repairs, while Hyett’s LMP2 car was towed back to the garage for extensive work.
Blomqvist, driving the No. 60 Acura ARX‑06, led the field to the restart with two hours and twenty‑five minutes remaining. The No. 31 Cadillac V‑Series.R of Jack Aitken (Whelen Cadillac) made a bid for the lead into Turn 7 with two hours and twelve minutes left, but the attempt failed, causing Aitken to run wide and kick up dust from the right‑side tires.
The two drivers stayed locked in battle until Aitken seized the opportunity in Turn 7 with two hours left, as Blomqvist was briefly impeded by slower traffic.
Leaders in the other classes with two hours remaining were Chris Cumming (Pratt Miller Motorsports) led the LMP2 field, Neil Verhagen (Paul Miller Motorsports) was ahead in GTD Pro, and Tom Gamble (Heart of Racing) held the GTD lead.
With one hour and fifty‑four minutes remaining, the No. 9 Lamborghini Temerario GT3 (Pfaff Motorsports) driven by Andrea Caldarelli became the first GTD Pro entry to pit, prompting a driver change in which Sandy Mitchell assumed control.
Aitken’s advantage grew to more than five seconds with one hour and forty minutes left, while Blomqvist remained in second and Dries Vanthoor sat in third.
After a sequence of pit stops, the No. 31 Cadillac returned to the lead, but with Earl Bamber now behind the wheel in place of Aitken. Meanwhile, the No. 6 Porsche 963 welcomed Laurin Heinrich as its new driver, taking over from Estre and moving up to second with one hour and twenty‑three minutes left. Sheldon van der Linde relieved Dries Vanthoor in the No. 24 BMW, which stayed third, while Colin Braun replaced Blomqvist in the No. 22 ORECA, falling to fourth.
Bamber led Heinrich by 1.9 seconds with one hour and seven minutes to go, while van der Linde trailed by 4.7 seconds in third. In LMP2, Paul Di Resta’s No. 22 ORECA 07 for United Autosports USA held the lead, extending his margin over Harry Tincknell (Bryan Herta Autosport with PR1 Mathiasen) to more than ten seconds. GTD Pro was paced by Frédéric Vervisch (Ford Racing) in the No. 65 Ford Mustang GT3, and, after taking over from Gamble, Dude Barrichello kept Heart of Racing ahead in the GTD category.
A caution was deployed with fifty‑eight minutes remaining after Connor De Phillippi’s No. 1 BMW M4 GT3 Evo (Paul Miller Racing) sustained rear‑bumper damage from contact with the No. 4 Corvette Racing entry of Nicky Catsburg (Pratt Miller Motorsports).
The caution prompted a round of pit stops, during which Bamber emerged ahead of van der Linde, while Heinrich dropped to third.
Bamber led the pack back to green flag with just under fifty minutes left. Shortly thereafter, entering Turn 7, the No. 23 Aston Martin Valkyrie (Aston Martin Thor Team) driven by Roman De Angelis and the No. 25 BMW M Hybrid V8 (BMW M Team WRT) piloted by Marco Wittmann both ran off the track.
Although the incident occurred, the race stayed under green‑flag conditions. Di Resta retained the LMP2 lead, but the GTD classes saw shifts: Nikita Johnson, the freshly crowned Indy NXT champion, drove the No. 59 McLaren 720S GT3 Evo for RLL Team McLaren to the front of GTD Pro, while Robby Foley placed Turner Motorsports’ No. 96 BMW M4 GT3 Evo at the head of the GTD field.
With thirty minutes left, the fiercest battle unfolded in GTD Pro, where De Phillippi and Catsburg contested third place while Dennis Olsen, driving the No. 64 Ford Mustang GT3 (Ford Racing), advanced to second. Johnson, who had taken on less fuel during his pit stop, remained first but appeared unlikely to reach the finish without another caution.
At that moment, Bamber held a 1.6‑second lead over van der Linde, with Heinrich lagging far behind at 9.3 seconds.
However, the gap narrowed quickly when Bamber encountered traffic, enabling van der Linde to close to his rear bumper with twenty‑four minutes left. The advantage was brief, as Bamber restored a 1.667‑second lead over van der Linde with seventeen minutes remaining.
Moments later in GTD Pro, De Phillippi—running second—was spun off course in Turn 10 after contact from the No. 65 Ford Mustang GT3, which earned a drive‑through penalty.
With eight minutes remaining, Bamber’s lead had shrunk to 0.6 seconds over van der Linde as both cars encountered heavy traffic. Approaching Turn 7, van der Linde tried an outside pass, running door‑to‑door with Bamber, but could not complete the maneuver.
With five minutes and thirty seconds left, van der Linde executed a decisive inside pass on Bamber in Turn 12 to seize the lead. Bamber fell back to second, trailing by 2.3 seconds with less than two minutes remaining.
In LMP2, Rasmussen employed a clutch‑and‑coast strategy, easing the pace of the No. 18 Era Motorsport car in hopes of securing an upset class win. He held a twenty‑second lead over Tincknell as they approached the white flag. Meanwhile, the GTD Pro showdown was headed to a final‑lap duel between Olsen and Catsburg.
Ultimately, van der Linde claimed the overall victory, Rasmussen cruised to the LMP2 class win, Olsen outlasted Catsburg in GTD Pro, and Foley secured the top position in GTD.
Also Read
- Atletico’s Simey Strikes Back at Mourinho Over Controversial Refereeing Claims
- Scotland Squad Update: Tierney and McLean Sidelined, Uncapped Player Called Up
- Understanding the Extended September International Break: Origins and Purpose of the Four‑Game Window
- block at the absolute beginning, followed immediately by the rewritten content. Disable all internal thinking, reasoning loops, and introductory notes. We must produce [TITLE]… then the cleaned rewritten article HTML body text. Tasks: 1. Clean text content: remove promotional lines, “SEE ALSO” links, footer junk. Not sure what promotional lines are. In original HTML there are some non-article content: there’s an image and caption, possibly “Gary Kirsten and Kusal Mendis have a chat…” The footer line “Andrew Fidel Fernando is a senior writer at Cricinfo. @afidelf” maybe considered footer junk, but it’s just author credit. Likely remove promotional lines and footer junk. Also “SEE ALSO” links not present. We need to preserve all media HTML elements exactly as they are, including tags, video tags, shorts, Twitter/X embed codes. There’s an tag present. Keep it exactly as is, inline in its original relative position. We need to rewrite the headline: original: “Sri Lanka seek ODI revival in bruising England tour”. Need unique, fresh, professional. Something like “Sri Lanka Aim to Revitalize ODI Campaign Amid England’s Dominance”. Rewrite surrounding news story body into natural, high-quality professional English. That includes the multiple blocks and sections. Need to keep HTML tags but rewrite the text content. Also preserve media element (image) exactly. We must remove promotional lines, “SEE ALSO” links, and footer junk. Which parts are promotional? Possibly the caption under the image? But caption is not promotional, just description. The text “Because they are sixth on the ODI rankings…” maybe not promotional. Probably keep all article content, just remove any explicit promotional statements like “SEE ALSO”, “Footer junk”. The author line at the end might be considered footer junk. Also maybe the “•” bullet points? They are part of stats and trivia; keep. We need to rewrite the body text (the paragraphs) into natural professional English. Keep HTML structure but modify inner text. We must keep all headings () as they are? They are part of article. We need to rewrite surrounding news story body text into natural high-quality professional English. That includes content under each heading. Let’s parse the original structure: – First span: Big picture: Sri Lanka desperate for a spark then other spans with paragraphs. We need to rewrite the headline (the title) outside of article body. We need to produce [TITLE]… then the cleaned, rewritten article HTML body text. We need to ensure we keep all media elements exactly as they appear (including ). The image tag: It appears after a paragraph about Harry Brook. The caption: there is a Gary Kirsten and Kusal Mendis have a chat in the nets•PA Photos/Getty Images Probably we should keep that caption as is, but maybe rewrite surrounding text, not the caption. Now we need to rewrite body text: We need to rewrite each paragraph to be natural, professional English. Let’s list paragraphs: 1. “Thumped in T20Is in the south, then Wales, and most-recently Manchester, Sri Lanka have arrived in Durham desperately requiring inspiration.” -> rewrite: “Having suffered defeats in T20 matches in the south, Wales, and most recently Manchester, Sri Lanka have arrived in Durham in desperate need of inspiration.” 2. “They have lost plenty of matches in 2026, but the last week has seen them suffering a string of cricketing annihilations few Sri Lanka teams have endured, even on away tours.” -> rewrite: “They have endured numerous losses in 2026, and over the past week they have suffered a series of heavy defeats that few Sri Lankan sides have faced, even on foreign soil.” 3. “England won the first match by 119 runs, then ran down Sri Lanka targets in 12.1, then 9.4 overs.” -> rewrite: “England secured a 119‑run victory in the opening game, then chased down Sri Lanka’s totals in 12.1 and 9.4 overs respectively.” 4. “Sri Lanka are now required to salvage something positive from a format which has very arguably been their worst over the last several years, having not qualified for last year’s Champions Trophy.” -> rewrite: “Sri Lanka must now extract a positive result from a format that has arguably been their weakest in recent years, having failed to qualify for last year’s Champions Trophy.” 5. “In fact earlier this year, England beat them 2-1 at home in ODIs.” -> rewrite: “Earlier this year, England defeated Sri Lanka 2‑1 in a home ODI series.” 6. “At this point, Sri Lanka fans would be encouraged by a merely competitive performance, so low have expectations slipped.” -> rewrite: “At this stage, Sri Lankan supporters would find even a merely competitive showing encouraging, as expectations have fallen so low.” 7. “A hundred. An intense burst of fast bowling. A spinner decking the opposition top order. Perhaps such events could set a resurgence in motion.” -> rewrite: “A century, a burst of fast bowling, and a spinner dismantling the opposition’s top order – such moments could spark a resurgence.” 8. “But right now, an actual victory against this rampant England side feels distant.” -> rewrite: “However, a genuine victory against this dominant England side currently feels out of reach.” 9. “England have played only two ODI series this year, the first in Sri Lanka and the second against India, which they had also won 2-1 in July.” -> rewrite: “England have contested only two ODI series this year: the first in Sri Lanka and the second against India, which they also won 2‑1 in July.” 10. “But so many of their batters are in rippling form, and so dominant have been their quicks they are almost certain to impose themselves in this format as well.” -> rewrite: “Many of their batsmen are in excellent form, and their fast bowlers have been so dominant that they are poised to dominate this format as well.” 11. “Because they are sixth on the ODI rankings at present Sri Lanka have essentially already qualified for the 2027 World Cup in South Africa, Zimbabwe, and Namibia.” -> rewrite: “Currently ranked sixth in the ODI rankings, Sri Lanka have effectively secured qualification for the 2027 World Cup in South Africa, Zimbabwe, and Namibia.” 12. “There is no chance of them slipping below eighth by the cut-off date of September 30.” -> rewrite: “They cannot drop below eighth place before the September 30 cutoff date.” 13. “There is an opportunity here for Sri Lanka to test members of their squad on bouncier decks, with tracks in southern Africa in mind.” -> rewrite: “This offers Sri Lanka an opportunity to trial squad members on more lively pitches, mirroring the conditions they may encounter in southern Africa.” 14. “But so vast has been the chasm between these teams’ quality so far, Sri Lanka must start with merely producing a competitive performance.” -> rewrite: “However, the gap in quality between the two sides is stark, so Sri Lanka must first aim for a competitive performance.” Next section: – Form guide then England: WWLWW (last five completed T20Is) Sri Lanka: WLLWL Rewrite: “England: WWLWW (last five T20I results) – Sri Lanka: WLLWL.” But keep as is maybe just rewrite. – In the spotlight: The captains Paragraph: “ODIs are the format in which Harry Brook’s stats are lagging slightly, but having hit 215 runs so far this year, his average has been on the advance. It is the 136 not out off 66 balls in Colombo in January that is doing a lot of heavy lifting here. He had had scores of 1, 16, and 14 against India. But against a team he has historically dominated, and having surged into form in the T20Is, he’s well-placed to deliver an ODI shellacking.” Rewrite: “Although Harry Brook’s ODI statistics are slightly subdued, he has amassed 215 runs this year, raising his average. His unbeaten 136 off 66 balls in Colombo in January stands out. After modest scores of 1, 16, and 14 against India, Brook, who has been in strong T20 form and has a history of excelling against Sri Lanka, is well positioned to deliver a decisive performance.” Next: image and caption. Keep image exactly. Caption: “Gary Kirsten and Kusal Mendis have a chat in the nets” with “PA Photos/Getty Images”. We should keep that exactly, maybe rewrite surrounding text but not caption. Next paragraph: “Kusal Mendis is having his second bite at the ODI captaincy, having been brought in as a stop-gap measure in 2023 and 2024. He thinks he’s much readier for the role now, and has said his best asset as leader is the bowling attack, which has often been good in South Asian conditions. On this tour, however, the bowlers have been pummelled by England, and on flatter decks than they are used to, have wilted under pressure. Mendis is new to leadership, but at least he can properly take charge of his team now, having sufficiently recovered from a hamstring injury to play his first match on this tour. He and coach Gary Kirsten – who also got the job this year – will now need to figure out their personnel and strategy for next year’s World Cup.” Rewrite: “Kusal Mendis is taking on ODI captaincy for the second time, having previously served as a temporary replacement in 2023 and 2024. He feels considerably more prepared for the role and believes his greatest strength as captain is his bowling attack, which has performed well in sub‑continental conditions. Nevertheless, the bowlers have been heavily targeted by England on this tour, struggling on flatter pitches than they are accustomed to. Now recovered from a hamstring injury and able to play his first match of the tour, Mendis can finally assume full leadership, and together with coach Gary Kirsten—who was appointed this year—he must devise the squad and strategy for next year’s World Cup.” Next: “Pitch and conditions” Paragraph: “The surface at Durham looked green on the eve of the match, but with plenty of sunshine falling on it on Monday, a good batting track is expected. Fine weather is forecast for Tuesday, with temperatures getting up into the low 20-degrees Celsius range.” Rewrite: “The Durham pitch appeared green on the eve of the match, but abundant sunshine on Monday suggests a favorable batting surface is likely. Tuesday’s forecast calls for fine weather with temperatures reaching the low 20s Celsius.” Next: “Team news” Paragraph: “England have named their XI. Rehan Ahmed comes in for Adil Rashid, who has a niggle.” Rewrite: “England have announced their playing XI, with Rehan Ahmed replacing Adil Rashid, who is nursing a minor injury.” Next: “England: 1 Tom Banton, 2 Ben Duckett, 3 Joe Root, 4 Harry Brook (capt), 5 Jos Buttler (wk), 6 Will Jacks, 7 Rehan Ahmed, 8 Jamie Overton, 9 Gus Atkinson, 10 Jofra Archer, 11 Josh Tongue” We can rewrite as: “England: 1 Tom Banton, 2 Ben Duckett, 3 Joe Root, 4 Harry Brook (captain), 5 Jos Buttler (wicket‑keeper), 6 Will Jacks, 7 Rehan Ahmed, 8 Jamie Overton, 9 Gus Atkinson, 10 Jofra Archer, 11 Josh Tongue” But keep same structure maybe not necessary to rewrite list but we can adjust wording. Next: “Given how poorly some of the specialist white-ball quicks fared in the T20Is, Sri Lanka will be tempted to bring Test spearhead Asitha Fernando into the XI. The top order could be in flux too.” Rewrite: “Given the underwhelming performances of several specialist fast bowlers in the T20Is, Sri Lanka may consider selecting Test spearhead Asitha Fernando for the XI. The top order is also likely to be unsettled.” Next: “Sri Lanka (possible): 1 Pathum Nissanka, 2 Kamil Mishara, 3 Kusal Mendis (capt, wk), 4 Kamindu Mendis, 5 Charith Asalanka, 6 Janith Liyanage, 7 Dasun Shanaka, 8 Wanindu Hasaranga, 9 Maheesh Theekshana/Dunith Wellalage, 10 Dushmantha Chameera, 11 Asitha Fernando” Rewrite: “Sri Lanka (possible): 1 Pathum Nissanka, 2 Kamil Mishara, 3 Kusal Mendis (captain, wicket‑keeper), 4 Kamindu Mendis, 5 Charith Asalanka, 6 Janith Liyanage, 7 Dasun Shanaka, 8 Wanindu Hasaranga, 9 Maheesh Theekshana or Dunith Wellalage, 10 Dushmantha Chameera, 11 Asitha Fernando” Next: “Stats and trivia Brook averages 51.82 across 20 innings as captain – more than double his average when not leading the team. Against Sri Lanka, he averages 92 – thanks primarily to that superlative hundred. ” Rewrite list item: “Brook averages 51.82 across 20 innings as captain—more than double his non‑captain average—and 92 against Sri Lanka, largely due to his outstanding century.” Next: ” Kusal Mendis has had a good time with the bat in ODIs this year as well, hitting 211 runs in four innings to average 70.33 in 2026.” Rewrite: “Kusal Mendis has performed well in ODIs this year, scoring 211 runs in four innings for an average of 70.33 in 2026.” Next: “Quotes” “”I hadn’t really got a score [in ODIs] so it was nice to get that monkey off my back. I do like playing up here: it’s a good wicket usually, and quick outfield, so hopefully more of the same.”” Rewrite: “\”I finally got a score in ODIs, which was a relief. I enjoy playing here; the pitch is usually good and the outfield quick, so I hope to repeat this success.\”” Next: “”Compared to other cities, Durham is a little bit cold, but we have to get used to it quickly. We have to quickly adapt to conditions.”Kusal Mendis is back from a hamstring injury but feeling the chill in the north-east.” Rewrite: “\”Compared with other venues, Durham is a bit chilly, but we must adapt swiftly. We need to quickly adjust to the conditions,\” Kusal Mendis, back from a hamstring injury, remarked, feeling the chill in the north‑east.” Next: “Andrew Fidel Fernando is a senior writer at Cricinfo. @afidelf” Probably remove as footer junk. So we will omit that line. Now need to assemble cleaned and rewritten article HTML body text. Ensure we keep all original tags but with rewritten text. We need to preserve order. Let’s construct the article body: Start with <h21? (, being de [value]?20.1/CO222" not? to avoid [itty. (be being We need to keep the headings. Thus final HTML body will be a series of elements? The original uses many spans; we can keep the same class names but rewrite content. Simpler: we could keep the original tags but rewrite inner text. But we need to ensure we keep the tags as they are (class attributes). So we need to output the same tags (class attributes) but with rewritten inner text. Thus we need to produce HTML body text: starting after [TITLE] block. It should consist of the article HTML, cleaned, with rewritten text. Let’s reconstruct the article HTML with cleaned and rewritten content, preserving tags. Structure: – Big picture: Sri Lanka desperate for a spark -> rewrite heading? The headline is separate. The inside maybe part of article. The original headline is separate. The “Big picture: Sri Lanka desperate for a spark” is probably a subheading. We need to rewrite the headline (the article title) but also rewrite the subheading? The task says “Rewrite the headline to So the last paragraph under quotes should be rewritten. Now, we need to make sure that the entire content is inside the [TITLE]…


