The official White House statement notably omitted any reference to Taiwan, despite the topic being a clear priority for Xi Jinping.
According to Beijing’s version of the discussions, Xi pressed Trump to formally oppose Taiwanese independence and proceed with caution on the matter.
Following their May meeting, Trump disclosed that Xi had directly asked whether the United States would defend Taiwan in the event of a Chinese military strike.
He remarked to reporters, “There’s only one person that knows that, and it is me,” questioning whether it made strategic sense for US forces to “travel 9,500 miles to fight a war” over the issue.
However, Trump provided far fewer details during this summit.
“We didn’t talk about it too much,” he told reporters over the weekend.
“Right now, it’s fine. It’s just moving along,” Trump stated. “He understands very much how I feel.”
This conspicuous silence may carry significant geopolitical weight.
Trump has previously characterized a proposed $14 billion US arms package for Taiwan as “a very good negotiating chip” in his negotiations with Beijing. The arms package has remained on hold for months.
Adding to the confusion, US Ambassador to China David Perdue told Fox News that Trump had offered to sell weapons to Xi during the summit.
The State Department subsequently clarified that US law prohibits arms sales to China and that there are no current plans to do so.
Beijing considers the self-governing island to be part of China. Most nations, including the United States, do not recognize Taiwan as an independent state; however, Washington opposes any attempts to seize the island by force and remains committed to supplying it with defensive weapons.
Also Read
- \nEU Forges Emergency Security Protocol Amid Heightened Russian Hybrid Threat Warning\n\nThe EU is drawing up a new mechanism to coordinate its response to Russian sabotage and other hybrid attacks, as European officials warn that Moscow is planning further operations across the continent.\n\nEuropean foreign ministers meeting in Brussels on Monday have been tasked with developing the bloc’s so‑called “emergency security protocol,” designed to help member states coordinate their responses quickly when a hybrid threat is identified.\n\n“We need to be vigilant because we see in the intelligence that Russia is planning more sabotage acts,” EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said as she arrived for the talks.\n\nKallas said such attacks were aimed at European democracy, seeking to divide communities and intimidate them into withdrawing support for Ukraine.\n\n“We have to keep this in mind while standing up to these threats,” she added.\n\nThe mechanism, spearheaded by Kallas and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, is intended to sit at the heart of the EU’s response to hybrid warfare.\n\nOutlined by von der Leyen in her State of the European Union speech in Strasbourg in mid‑September, it would form part of a new security structure and could be triggered by a member state when a hybrid threat is identified.\n\nEU countries would then convene to coordinate their response.\n\nKallas said the mechanism would cover incidents that fall “under the threshold for armed aggression” but nonetheless require a response.\n\nThe urgency has been underscored by a series of recent incidents, including the breach of Finnish airspace by a Russian aircraft over the Gulf of Finland on Friday, prompting Finnish and Swedish authorities to scramble fighter jets.\n\nFinnish Defence Minister Antti Hækkenän said on his way into Monday’s meeting that Europe and NATO must take “bigger measures” and establish “stronger coordination” to counter such activities.\n\nAsked about Friday’s airspace violation, Hækkenän said the incident should serve as a catalyst for Europe to strengthen its air defences further. “We need money,” he said, adding: “We need joint procurements.”\n\nSwedish Defence Minister Pål Jonson said Russia was seeking to “scare” and “intimidate” Ukraine’s allies through hybrid attacks, but argued that the strategy would fail as the EU continued to support Kyiv and impose further restrictions on Moscow.\n\n“We welcome more measures when it comes to combating the shadow fleet, when it comes to more sanctions, more visa restrictions, and of course with more support to Ukraine,” he remarked.\n\nThe incident occurred on the same day that the Danish Defence Intelligence Service (DDIS) said the risk of Russian military action against NATO countries was growing, while describing an outright invasion as “highly unlikely” but not impossible.\n\nSpanish daily newspaper El Mundo also reported last week that Russia could be preparing a drone operation targeting Spain, France and Italy.\n\nEstonia’s newly appointed Defence Minister Martin Herem said on his way into the defence meeting that Tallinn’s priority is to continue supporting Ukraine, whether through bilateral action or further discussions on the long‑debated immobilised Russian assets.\n\n“It’s all despite the fact that the Russian Foreign Minister (Sergey Lavrov) threatened us for that, and the Russian special forces are conducting sabotage acts,” he said.\n\nMinisters are also expected to discuss the EU’s first Defence Readiness Report — described by Reuters as an assessment warning that the bloc is not rearming quickly enough to be ready to defend against Russia by 2030.\n\nThe year 2030 has been identified by various European intelligence agencies as a potential point by which the Kremlin could be prepared to launch armed aggression against NATO allies.\n\nTo reduce that risk, EU member states must address gaps in air and missile defence, ground combat capabilities, naval forces, ammunition stockpiles and drones, according to Reuters.\n\nEOF_PROCESS_END\n[edit_tool(action=’read’, path=”)]
- Rethinking Collective Defense: NATO’s Shift Toward Data, Software, and Uncrewed Systems
- Israel revokes diplomatic status of Dutch diplomats in Ramallah
- Oil prices jump as Trump dismisses Iran’s Hormuz reopening proposal