Tigray’s Capture of Mekelle Marks Escalating Conflict and Regional Tensions

Addis Ababa, Ethiopia – After nearly two weeks of intense fighting, Ethiopian federal forces have entered the Tigrayan capital, Mekelle, as an alliance of rebel groups, including the Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPLF), withdrew from the city. The latest offensive has effectively ended the 2022 Pretoria ceasefire and the fragile peace that followed the devastating Tigray war.

The fall of Mekelle may signal the end of conventional warfare rather than the conclusion of the conflict. Fighting continues across Tigray, and reports suggest Eritrean troops have entered northern towns, adding a potentially dangerous regional dimension.

Ethiopian forces employed air power and ground troops to advance through Tigray. After successive defeats near Alamata and Kobo, rebel forces retreated to the countryside and pledged to keep fighting.

“We will confront the enemy on our terms and where we choose,” said TPLF leader Debretsion Gebremichael.

A war that may not be over

The current phase echoes the 2020 conflict, when Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed’s government declared victory after federal forces captured Mekelle. Tigrayan forces regrouped in the mountains, retook much of the region, and prolonged the war for nearly a year and a half. The renewed fighting could follow a similar trajectory if the TPLF and allied groups turn the mountainous terrain into a protracted insurgency.

Ethiopia already contends with insurgencies in Amhara and Oromia, stretching federal forces across multiple fronts. Battlefield setbacks for the rebels have raised concerns beyond Tigray, particularly in Egypt and among Ethiopia’s regional rivals, according to Hossamaldeen Ibrahim, an African analyst at the Bloomsbury Intelligence and Security Institute.

“Egypt views the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam and any Ethiopian move toward the Red Sea as a strategic threat, so it has aligned with Eritrea, Sudan, and Somalia against unilateral Ethiopian actions,” Ibrahim told Al Jazeera.

Ethiopia’s Red Sea ambitions

Ethiopia has been landlocked since Eritrea’s independence in 1991, making Addis Ababa dependent on neighboring states for international trade. Since 2023, Prime Minister Abiy has made Red Sea access a strategic priority, heightening concerns in Eritrea, especially regarding the port of Assab.

Currently, Ethiopia relies heavily on Djibouti for maritime trade while pursuing alternative routes through Kenya and Somaliland. After being sworn in for another five‑year term following his party’s June 1 election victory, Abiy again highlighted the issue in his parliamentary address.

“Based on the principle of give and take, we will work diligently to ensure that Ethiopia has an outlet to the sea,” he declared.

A loose regional alignment

In recent months, Egypt, Eritrea, Sudan, and Somalia have shared concerns over Ethiopia’s regional ambitions. On October 4, leaders of these four nations met in New Alamein, Egypt, to discuss regional issues and pledged to strengthen political, economic, and trade cooperation. The summit’s joint declaration emphasized respect for sovereignty, non‑interference, and peaceful dispute resolution.

Relations between Ethiopia and Eritrea have sharply deteriorated since the Pretoria ceasefire. Ethiopia closed its embassy in Eritrea, expelled Eritrean diplomats, and accused Asmara of hostile acts and involvement in the renewed fighting. Eritrea responded by severing diplomatic ties while denying support for the opposition alliance. Egypt and Sudan have also denied Ethiopian accusations of backing the rebel coalition.

The Ethiopian army’s advance into Tigray adds another layer to this rivalry.

“The Ethiopian army’s advance in Tigray directly threatens Eritrean President Isaias Afwerki and the Eritrean state,” said Etana H. Dinka, an assistant professor of African history at the University of Miami.

Eritrean forces fought alongside Ethiopian troops during the 2020‑22 Tigray war, but relations between Abiy and Isaias have since soured. Reports from the Associated Press indicate Eritrean troops entered northern Tigrayan towns such as Adigrat and Idaga Hamus, though Eritrea has neither confirmed nor denied these movements.

Eritrea’s role could be decisive

For Eritrea, both the location and outcome of the fighting are critical. A prolonged Tigray conflict could keep Ethiopian forces occupied, limiting Addis Ababa’s ability to pursue Red Sea ambitions. Conversely, a decisive Ethiopian victory could free the federal government to focus on regional rivals.

“With reports that Eritrean troops are moving into Tigray, Eritrea appears keen on bolstering TPLF forces withdrawing northwards, so that engagement between Ethiopian and Eritrean soldiers occurs in Tigrayan territory, not in Eritrea,” said Mohamed Kheir Omer, a Horn of Africa researcher.

This approach could incentivize Eritrea to support forces capable of tying down the Ethiopian army without directly confronting it.

Sudan adds another layer

Sudan’s civil war introduces another dimension to the regional rivalry. Egypt has provided political backing and logistical support to Sudan’s army, while the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) have been accused of atrocities in Darfur.

Ethiopia has faced accusations of facilitating support for the RSF. A Reuters investigation reported in February that Ethiopia hosted a training camp in its western Benishangul‑Gumuz region for thousands of RSF‑linked fighters, allegedly funded by the United Arab Emirates. The UAE denied the allegations, and Reuters could not independently verify the claims.

These competing relationships form part of a broader contest over the Nile, Sudan, the Red Sea, and trade routes.

For Egypt, the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam dispute remains a key strategic concern. For Eritrea, Ethiopia’s pursuit of Red Sea access is viewed through a national‑security lens. For Sudan’s neighbors, the conflict threatens to reshape regional power balances.

Will Egypt, Eritrea, Sudan, and Somalia intervene?

The shared interests of Ethiopia’s regional rivals do not necessarily translate into direct military intervention.

Egypt is focused on the Nile and Sudanese dynamics. Eritrea has a direct security stake in Tigray’s developments. Somalia grapples with its own security challenges and a complex relationship with Addis Ababa. Sudan remains preoccupied with its devastating civil war.

Ethiopia’s federal forces now face the prospect of fighting on multiple fronts. The TPLF, Amhara Fano, and the Oromo Liberation Army (OLA) each challenge the government in different regions. If they sustain pressure while retreating from major population centers, the fall of Mekelle could be only the first phase of a prolonged conflict.

For Ethiopia’s rivals, the question is whether to exploit this vulnerability or avoid being drawn into another regional war.

The extent of any regional involvement may ultimately depend on whether the TPLF can keep federal forces occupied in Tigray and away from the Eritrean border.

“It isn’t difficult to understand Cairo’s commitment to prevent Ethiopia from succeeding in the current warfare, whatever its army’s intended goals—including Abiy’s acclaimed access to the Red Sea—are,” said University of Miami’s Dinka.

The critical question now is whether these regional calculations remain diplomatic or spill onto the battlefield.

Source link