Despite facing criticism from both Israeli officials and U.S. lawmakers, the nuclear agreement between the United States and Saudi Arabia has moved forward.

As news of the deal broke on Wednesday, several Israeli politicians voiced concerns that Saudi Arabia could emerge as a new nuclear threat in the region. Israel, widely believed to possess nuclear capabilities though never officially confirmed, aligned with the U.S. in its opposition to Iran’s nuclear program.

“A civilian nuclear program in Saudi Arabia will lead to a mad arms race across the entire Middle East,” warned Avigdor Lieberman, a member of the Israeli parliament and former defense minister, in a social media post.

Democratic lawmakers in Congress echoed similar concerns about the agreement.

“This deal really is a giveaway to the Saudis, and it’s only going to fuel further ambitions from Iran. It’s only going to further destabilize the region with Israel,” said Democratic Congressman Ro Khanna of California in an interview with the BBC. “It’s just not smart policy.”

U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright defended the agreement, stating it would benefit the American economy and enhance national security. In a statement shared on social media, Wright emphasized that the U.S.-Saudi nuclear pact would “uphold the highest standards of nuclear safety and nonproliferation.”

However, the administration’s handling of the announcement raised questions when details about the agreement were not immediately made public on Wednesday. Notably, President Trump did not personally oversee the signing ceremony that formalized the deal.

Instead, Trump participated in a dignified transfer ceremony honoring four U.S. service members who lost their lives in Iran, followed by a campaign rally in Georgia where he claimed his policies had made the Middle East more stable than ever.

Source link

Exit mobile version