NEW YORK CITY — The United Nations’ peacekeeping chief warned on Wednesday that Lebanese armed forces and Israeli forces could be left facing one another without a third-party buffer once the UN Interim Force in Lebanon’s mandate expires at the end of the year, and urged the Security Council to consider what might follow.
Jean-Pierre Lacroix, the under-secretary-general for peace operations, said that during a recent visit to Lebanon, Lebanese leaders had raised concerns about a security vacuum in the south, and he said some of those concerns appeared warranted.
“Do we really believe that the Lebanese army and the Israel Defense Forces can be just left facing one another without any third party?” he asked, briefing reporters at UN headquarters in New York.
Lacroix said the UNIFIL liaison and deconfliction mechanism had been “very effective,” both in preventing unintended escalation and in securing access for humanitarian convoys that needed clearance from all parties, particularly the Israeli military.
“If we don’t have that anymore, then do we really have any other mechanism that would provide for this kind of de-escalation?” he added.
He said he met with President Joseph Aoun, Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri, ministers and the Lebanese army commander during his recent visit. All raised concerns about the prospect of no third-party presence in southern Lebanon, the end of monitoring and reporting along the Blue Line that separates Lebanon from Israel, and the loss of UNIFIL’s demining and engineering capabilities.
About 10,000 people live between the Blue Line and Israel’s so-called yellow line, Lacroix said, cautioning that an exact figure was difficult to establish. Humanitarian access to them would be “really vital,” he added.
Military observers from the UN Truce Supervision Organization would retain their mandate, which predates that of UNIFIL, but Lacroix questioned how unarmed observers could operate without UNIFIL support in an area strewn with mines and unexploded ordnance and where “there is kinetic activity going on.”
Plans for UNIFIL’s withdrawal, prepared under the supervision of its commander, Maj. Gen. Diodato Abagnara, were ready and flexible enough to adapt should the Security Council authorize a follow-on UN presence, he said. So far, however, little movement had occurred within the council, he added.
Pressed by Arab News about reports that Washington had ruled out any UN presence in southern Lebanon following the withdrawal, Lacroix declined to speculate.
“As long as the discussions at the Security Council haven’t really started, we can’t really prejudge the outcome,” he said. “It’s a bit pointless to speculate on the kind of position, ultimately, that particular member state or another member state will take.”
“Lebanon needs international support; that’s very clear,” he said, and he welcomed an EU mission to train and build the capacity of the Lebanese army and police. Talks on a separate multinational force were ongoing, he added, with no final decision on how or when it might operate.
Lacroix praised what he described as “courageous” decisions by Lebanese authorities, including their engagement in a US-mediated tripartite framework for talks with Israel, which the UN supported. The challenge, he said, was to ensure international backing that avoided “any stalling or even reversal” of progress made since the start of the year.
The issue of Hezbollah’s weapons, he said, was addressed by the goals of Resolution 1701, which ended the 2006 war between Israel and Hezbollah and governed security arrangements along the Israel-Lebanon border.
“Ultimately, it’s about restoring Lebanon’s full sovereignty, including full control of arms by the legitimate security forces and armed forces,” he said, while also ensuring the security concerns of Lebanon and the wider region, including Israel, were fully addressed.
“At least on Lebanon, the key objectives are not disputed; the question is how to get there,” he added.
Lacroix said his latest visit was likely to be the last that offered him a chance to see UNIFIL peacekeepers at work in the field, and he had gone to pay tribute to their decades of service.
UNIFIL’s mandate was established in March 1978 after Israel invaded southern Lebanon, and it was significantly expanded under Resolution 1701 after the 2006 war between Israel and Hezbollah. In August 2025, the Security Council unanimously adopted a French-drafted resolution that, in a compromise with the US, extended the mandate “for a final time” until Dec. 31, 2026. The force has a year from that date to complete its withdrawal.
In June, the UN’s secretary-general, Antonio Guterres, proposed three post-UNIFIL options for southern Lebanon. They included a force of about 2,000-5,500 UN personnel who would monitor the ceasefire and provide support for the Lebanese army, a proposal that was backed by several members of the Security Council, in particular China and Russia.
