Iran and the United States are at odds over nuclear inspections and the Strait of Hormuz as negotiators push for a final deal within 60 days.
Iran and the United States have presented divergent positions as they race against a 60‑day deadline for a comprehensive agreement. Disagreements persist on nuclear oversight and the implementation of any deal, underscoring the difficulty of bridging the two sides’ concerns.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Iran would not be allowed to levy tolls in the Strait of Hormuz under a final agreement, stressing that the strategic waterway must remain open to international shipping.
Iran, however, denied that it had agreed to allow IAEA inspectors back into the country. President Donald Trump said Tehran accepted the “highest level” of monitoring, but Iranian officials maintain that no such permission has been granted.
In Iran
- Military shifts to offensive doctrine: General Ahmad Reza Pourdastan, head of Iran’s Army Strategic Studies and Research Center, said Tehran has moved away from a purely defensive posture and now includes pre‑emptive operations in its military strategy. Quoted by the semi‑official Fars news agency, Pourdastan said Iran could “severely surprise the enemy” if national interests required it and added that much of the country’s military capability has yet to be used.
- No IAEA inspections planned: Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei denied any meeting with International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) chief Rafael Grossi and said there are currently no plans for visits or inspections by the UN nuclear watchdog. Baghaei stated that Iran’s dealings with the IAEA would be governed by existing procedures, its safeguards obligations, parliamentary legislation and decisions by the Supreme National Security Council. Iran suspended cooperation with the IAEA after US and Israeli strikes on its nuclear facilities in June 2025.
War diplomacy
- ‘No way’ US and Iran can finalise a deal in 60 days, analyst says: Charles Kupchan, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, told Al Jazeera there is “no way” Washington and Tehran can complete a final agreement within the 60‑day timeframe repeatedly cited by President Donald Trump. “I think we’re talking about at least into the next calendar year,” he said, adding that he would not be surprised if both sides simply “run out the clock” by continuing negotiations and keeping the Strait of Hormuz open without reaching a final deal before the end of Trump’s presidency.
- Qatar says LNG production could return to normal within weeks: Prime Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman bin Jassim Al Thani told the Financial Times that Qatar is preparing to restore normal liquefied natural gas (LNG) production after the interim US‑Iran deal. Qatar, the world’s second‑largest LNG producer, halted output in March following an Iranian drone attack on the Ras Laffan facility. Sheikh Mohammed said most production could resume within weeks, except at the damaged site, adding that QatarEnergy would only lift its force majeure declaration once it is satisfied that all safety and operational concerns have been addressed.
In the Gulf
- Rubio ‘trying to sell the deal’ with Iran on Gulf tour: US Secretary of State Marco Rubio is visiting the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait and Bahrain, three Gulf countries seen as among the most affected by the war with Iran. Rubio, who also serves as Trump’s national security adviser, is expected to reassure regional allies that US security commitments remain intact. He will also address the Gulf Cooperation Council in Bahrain, where he is “really trying to sell the deal”, amid concerns over Washington’s response to Iranian attacks.
In the US
- US Senate approves resolution to curb Trump’s war powers on Iran: The Senate voted 50‑48 to pass a measure requiring congressional approval for further US military action against Iran, marking the first time a war powers resolution on the conflict has cleared both chambers of Congress. Four Republicans – Bill Cassidy, Lisa Murkowski, Susan Collins and Rand Paul – joined nearly all Democrats in backing the measure, while Pennsylvania Democrat John Fetterman voted against it. The resolution is expected to face a veto from President Trump.
In Israel
- US ‘very naive’ on Iran, Ben‑Gvir says: Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben‑Gvir said the US would be “very naive” if it believed Iran would abandon its nuclear programme, and hinted that Israel may act independently against Tehran. “It is Israel’s responsibility to confront this Iranian threat and act against it alone,” he told Israel’s Channel 7, adding that “no circumstances” could force Israel to act “according to the dictates of a friend, even if that friend is truly great.” His remarks come amid reported tensions between Washington and Tel Aviv over Israel’s attacks on Lebanon and ongoing US‑Iran negotiations.
In Lebanon
- UN says ceasefire ‘largely holding’ in southern Lebanon: The United Nations said the ceasefire in southern Lebanon appears to be “largely holding”, although peacekeepers continue to observe Israeli military ground and air activity. UN spokesperson Stephane Dujarric said UNIFIL troops witnessed “heavy” machine‑gun fire and three tank rounds fired by Israeli forces near Biyyada on Monday, while drones were also seen “apparently to monitor UNIFIL peacekeepers”. The incident came a day after peacekeepers reported the first day without exchanges of fire since fighting escalated on March 2. The UN urged all sides to “adhere fully to the ceasefire and refrain from any escalation, particularly during this delicate period of ongoing negotiations”.
Also Read
- Why Detroit Autos Could Be in Trouble Soon. Hint: Saying Goodbye to Big Profits?
- Istanbul Rises as Global Tango Capital Through Turkish ‘Abrazo’ Tradition
- Iran’s Parliament Speaker Advocates for Regional Leadership in Middle East Security
- Progressive Candidates Backed by NYC Mayor Triumph in Key Democratic Primaries


