The murder case against the Utah man accused of killing Charlie Kirk last year, Tyler Robinson, is headed for trial, and the defendant could face the death penalty if he’s convicted, according to a new court ruling.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Utah District Judge Tony Graf sided with prosecutors on Tuesday who said they had “a mountain of evidence” that defendant Tyler Robinson fatally shot the conservative activist as he spoke to a crowd of thousands of students at Utah Valley University last September.
Robinson pleaded not guilty to all counts, included aggravated murder, following Graf’s decision. The 23-year-old defendant turned himself in a day after the shooting, and his lawyers have not offered alternative theories for Kirk’s death.
The defence team tried to block a trial or at least take the death penalty off the table, arguing that prosecutors failed to show Kirk’s shooting placed others around him at risk of death. That’s an aggravating factor under state law that makes Robinson eligible for capital punishment.
Kirk’s family called the ruling “an important step in our family’s pursuit of justice.”
“Every step in this process carries the weight of all that Charlie’s murder has taken from his family, especially his children who will grow up without their father,” they said in a statement.
Prosecutors said Robinson shot Kirk from a rooftop more than 122 meters away, knowing he could have missed and killed others at the open-air event.
“Tyler James Robinson shot and killed Charlie Kirk because he disagreed with him, and he did it by firing a high-powered rifle into a crowd of over 3,000 people, which created a great risk of death that anyone would know about,” said Ryan McBride, a prosecutor with the Utah County Attorney’s Office.
Graf had the option to send the case to trial on a lesser charge of murder, which carries a minimum sentence of 15 years and a maximum of life in prison. He said his decision to approve the aggravated murder charge was based on the positions of several people in and around a tent where Kirk was speaking, among other factors.
Staci Visser, an attorney for Robinson, argued that prosecutors were trying to “shoehorn” the case into Utah’s aggravated murder statute.
Prior case law requires prosecutors to show that there was a high probability — not merely a possibility — that other people could have been killed, she said.
Kirk was seated on a stage in an elevated position, not immediately near anyone else, when he was shot once in the neck.
“There is one shot. There is one bullet. There is one victim,” said Visser. “There is zero evidence that there was any action taken towards other people.”
Prosecutor Chad Grunander noted that the alleged murder weapon — a bolt-action rifle — was loaded with additional rounds that had not been fired, saying Robinson “came prepared to shoot again.”
The Tuesday hearing in state court came after prosecutors in July spent five days presenting evidence, including DNA and a handwritten note they allege Robinson left for his romantic partner that read, “I had the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk, and I took it.”
Kirk’s parents, Robert and Kathryn Kirk, entered the heavily secured courthouse arm in arm before the hearing in Provo. His widow, Erika Kirk, was seated beside them. The family stepped out briefly while a prosecutor described the shooting. Erika Kirk and her mother-in-law held each other in a long embrace while the judge read his ruling.
Robinson also faces potential sentencing enhancements if prosecutors can show he targeted Kirk for his political beliefs. Kirk was renowned among youth conservatives nationwide for his open-mic debates, and is seen as one of the biggest reasons behind President Trump’s 2024 re-election.
Prosecutors argued that a bullet found in the rifle, engraved with “Hey Fascist! CATCH!”, shows that Kirk was targeted for how the defendant perceived his politics. They have also alleged Robinson wrote “I had enough of his hatred. Some hate can’t be negotiated out,” in a text message about Kirk.
Also Read
- block at absolute beginning, then rewritten content. No internal thinking. Also must clean text: remove promotional lines, “SEE ALSO” links, footer junk. Also must protect all media elements exactly as they are (they are present: images? Not in provided snippet, but there are tags, maybe not considered media, but we need to keep them exactly). Also need to rewrite headline to unique, fresh, professional. We must rewrite surrounding news story body text into natural, high-quality, professional English. Also rewrite other paragraphs (the rest) after cleaning. We need to remove promotional lines, “SEE ALSO” links, footer junk. The original includes sections: after Immigration and Donald Trump etc., there are paragraphs about Trump, immigration, etc. Also there are sections about “MORE TOP NEWS”, “A very posh summer camp”, “RECOMMENDATIONS”. Those are likely footer junk. Must remove them. We need to keep all HTML media elements exactly as they are. In the snippet, there are tags, and some tags inside a . Also there is a Immigration and Donald Trump which is a header, but maybe considered text. However “SEE ALSO” links? There’s no explicit “SEE ALSO” but there are headings like MORE TOP NEWS, A very posh summer camp, RECOMMENDATIONS. Those seem to be non-news content, likely footer junk. Should remove them entirely (including their surrounding paragraphs). Also remove the paragraph about the Exorcist movie, Ssense, and the luxury hotel. Those are promotional or unrelated. Thus the core article is about Giorgia Meloni interview. Let’s extract core paragraphs that are relevant: Paragraph 1: The far right is on the march… (first ). Paragraph 2: Far-right parties leading polls… (second ). Paragraph 3: But one intriguing counterexample is Giorgia Meloni… (third ). Paragraph 4: Giorgia Meloni, the Italian prime minister, has a vision. (fourth). Paragraph 5: Once, it was extracting Italy… (fifth). Paragraph 6: When I spoke to Meloni recently… (sixth). Paragraph 7: (Read Roger’s …) This line contains promotional content: “Read Roger’s interview with Meloni and takeaways.” That’s likely a link/promo. The instruction: remove promotional lines, “SEE ALSO” links, and footer junk. This line is a promotional call to action. Should we remove it entirely? Probably yes: it’s a promotional line. So remove that entire paragraph (including the tags?). But we must keep media elements exactly. The tags are content; we can remove the whole paragraph, but we must keep the tags as they appear? The instruction: “ABSOLUTELY PROTECT ALL MEDIA: Do not alter, delete, or skip any HTML media elements. Leave all tags, video tags, shorts, and Twitter/X embed codes EXACTLY as they are. Keep them inline in their original relative positions.” The tags are not media (image, video). They are text formatting. So we can delete that whole paragraph (including tags) because it’s promotional content, not a media element. Paragraph 8: Italy has found a long-elusive stability… (eighth). Paragraph 9: As she has journeyed… (ninth). Paragraph 10: Her ambivalence over horrific history… (tenth). Paragraph 11: Meloni could offer an indication… (eleventh). Paragraph 12: Immigration and Donald Trump (header). Should we keep this header? It’s part of article content, but maybe considered a section header. It’s not a promotional line. It’s a heading. Keep it. Paragraph 13: Like all of Europe’s far-right leaders… (next paragraph). Paragraph 14: When she came to power… (next). Paragraph 15: She has also, however… (next). Paragraph 16: The idea has been not only… (next). Paragraph 17: Meloni’s impact… (next). Paragraph 18: That does not stop her using immigration… (next). Paragraph 19: Nor does it stop her… (next). Paragraph 20: With President Trump… (next). Paragraph 21: She’d thought the relationship… (next). Paragraph 22: But in the face of provocations… (next). Paragraph 23: She hasn’t spoken to Trump… (next). Paragraph 24: The future of Europe (header). Keep. Paragraph 25: Overall, her four years… (next). Paragraph 26: The E.U. has been perhaps the greatest peacemaking creation… (next). Paragraph 27: MORE TOP NEWS – this is a heading for footer content; likely remove entire block and its following paragraphs. So we need to remove this and the paragraphs following (Exorcist, Ssense, Gleneagles, etc.) and the RECOMMENDATIONS heading and its paragraph. Also remove any promotional lines. Thus we keep up to paragraph 26, then after that we cut off. Now we need to rewrite headline: Original “Talking With Giorgia Meloni”. Need unique, fresh, professional. Perhaps “Giorgia Meloni’s Strategic Vision for Europe”. Or “Italy’s Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni Shapes Europe’s Future”. Let’s pick something fresh: “Giorgia Meloni Charts a New Direction for Europe”. That seems professional. Now rewrite body text: We need to rewrite paragraphs into natural, high-quality professional English. Also we must preserve the structure (HTML tags). However we can rewrite the content inside the tags, but keep the tags. Also need to keep any class attributes. Keep all class attributes unchanged? The instruction: “Leave all tags, video tags, shorts, and Twitter/X embed codes EXACTLY as they are.” Not about class attributes. But we can rewrite the text inside tags while preserving tags. We need to rewrite each paragraph: Paragraph 1: “The far right is on the march. And in Europe, the birthplace of fascism, that has sparked big questions about what it means — for democracy, for the European Union — when far-right leaders actually govern.” Rewrite: “The far right is gaining momentum, and in Europe — the cradle of fascism — its rise raises profound questions about the implications for democracy and the European Union when nationalist leaders assume power.” Paragraph 2: “Far-right parties are leading the polls in Germany and France. Would they moderate once in power? Not necessarily. In Poland and Hungary, hard-right populist governments meaningfully chipped away at the rule of law.” Rewrite: “Far‑right parties are surging in the polls in Germany and France. Their willingness to moderate once in office is uncertain; in Poland and Hungary, hard‑right populist regimes have significantly eroded the rule of law.” Paragraph 3: “But one intriguing counterexample is Giorgia Meloni. Italy’s prime minister was the first far-right leader to take power in a founding member state of the E.U. She hasn’t rigged any courts or deployed the Italian navy to block immigrant boats. And rather than working to extract Italy from the E.U., she says she wants to change it from within. Today my colleague Roger Cohen, who recently sat down for a rare interview with Meloni, writes about what that might look like.” Rewrite: “Yet a compelling contrast is provided by Giorgia Meloni, Italy’s prime minister and the first far‑right leader to assume power in a founding EU member state. She has not tampered with the judiciary nor used the navy to deter migrant vessels, and instead of exiting the EU, she pledges to reform it from within. In a rare interview, my colleague Roger Cohen examines how this could unfold.” Paragraph 4: “Giorgia Meloni, the Italian prime minister, has a vision.” Rewrite: “Giorgia Meloni, Italy’s prime minister, holds a distinct vision for her country and Europe.” Paragraph 5: “Once, it was extracting Italy from the euro and the grip of the “usurers” of the European Central Bank in order to steer her country toward a far-right nationalist future. But that was before power tempered her. Now rather than turning her back on Europe, she wants Italy to lead it.” Rewrite: “Initially, her agenda called for exiting the euro and breaking free from the European Central Bank’s constraints to forge a nationalist future. However, after assuming office, her stance has moderated; rather than rejecting Europe, she now seeks for Italy to assume a leadership role within it.” Paragraph 6: “When I spoke to Meloni recently, she talked little of a sluggish economy, but a lot about an Italy that “does not run after others.” “I don’t like the idea of a submissive Italy,” she told me. She wants her country, the world’s eighth-largest economy, pivotally placed in the Mediterranean as the importance of Africa grows, to be “a protagonist — and one that can benefit all of Europe.”” Rewrite: “In a recent conversation, Meloni focused less on a stagnant economy and more on building an Italy that “does not chase others.” “I dislike the notion of a subservient Italy,” she said. She envisions her nation — the world’s eighth‑largest economy — positioned prominently in the Mediterranean, especially as Africa’s significance grows, aiming to become “a protagonist — and one that can benefit all of Europe.”” Paragraph 7: (remove) Paragraph 8: “Italy has found a long-elusive stability under her leadership. With President Emmanuel Macron of France departing next year, Meloni, who this week becomes the longest continually serving postwar prime minister of Italy, could emerge as the doyenne of European politics, a role once played by former Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany. Of course, Merkel welcomed refugees; Meloni does not.” Rewrite: “Italy has achieved a long‑sought stability under her leadership. As President Emmanuel Macron prepares to leave office next year, Meloni — now the longest‑serving post‑war Italian prime minister — could become Europe’s preeminent political figure, a position formerly held by ex‑Chancellor Angela Merkel. While Merkel embraced refugees, Meloni takes a different stance.” Paragraph 9: “As she has journeyed from post-Fascist roots to a pivotal place in European politics, Meloni has remained something of an enigma. In our interview, she described Mussolini’s rule, which she considered an inspiration in her youth, as a “particularly complex” time, even if the catastrophe of Il Duce’s dictatorship and his alliance with Hitler was clear enough by 1945.” Rewrite: “Having transitioned from her post‑Fascist origins to a central role in European politics, Meloni remains something of an enigma. In the interview, she characterized Mussolini’s regime — once an inspiration in her youth — as “particularly complex,” even though the catastrophe of his dictatorship and alliance with Hitler was evident by 1945.” Paragraph 10: “Her ambivalence over horrific history does not appear to affect her approach to the present, which is pragmatic.” Rewrite: “Her ambivalence toward this grim history does not seem to shape her current, pragmatic approach.” Paragraph 11: “Meloni could offer an indication of where Europe is heading. Marine Le Pen, of the once-outcast French far right, is the front-runner in next year’s presidential election; the hard-right AfD is leading polls in Germany. The countries at the very core of postwar European integration would then be tested in their fundamental orientation.” Rewrite: “Meloni may signal the direction Europe is taking. Marine Le Pen, once marginalized, now leads the French presidential race, while the German hard‑right AfD leads polling. The core nations of post‑war European integration face a test of their foundational orientation.” Paragraph 12: “Immigration and Donald Trump” – keep as header. Paragraph 13: “Like all of Europe’s far-right leaders, Meloni’s appeal has been based in part on her stance on immigration. During her election campaign, she warned of “ethnic replacement,” and relentlessly associated migrants with violence. In office, however, her approach shifted.” Rewrite: “As with other Europe’s far‑right leaders, Meloni’s appeal has drawn partly on her immigration stance. During the campaign, she warned of “ethnic replacement” and linked migrants to violence. In office, however, her approach has evolved.” Paragraph 14: “When she came to power in 2022, the E.U’s immigration policy centered on finding means to “spread the burden” — essentially distributing migrants across member states rather than reducing their flow. That has changed, due in part to Meloni, who led the E.U in a hard line against asylum seekers and illegal migrants, attempting to offshore their processing, a procedure that now has European support.” Rewrite: “Upon taking office in 2022, the EU’s immigration policy emphasized “burden sharing,” i.e., distributing migrants among member states rather than curbing flows. This stance shifted under Meloni, who championed a hard‑line position against asylum seekers and illegal migrants, pushing to relocate processing to third countries — a policy now backed across Europe.” Paragraph 15: “She has also, however, pushed the continent to see Africa as a land of potential rather than problems. Under a plan adopted in 2024, Italy has invested heavily in 18 African countries, from Tunisia to Mozambique, in fields including energy, water, health and agriculture. In Algeria alone, close to 90,000 acres of desert were planted with corn.” Rewrite: “Nevertheless, she has promoted Africa as a land of opportunity rather than a problem. Under a 2024 plan, Italy has heavily invested in 18 African nations — from Tunisia to Mozambique — covering energy, water, health, and agriculture. In Algeria alone, nearly 90,000 acres of desert have been planted with corn.” Paragraph 16: “The idea has been not only to encourage would-be migrants to stay home by increasing economic opportunity but also to build a strategic bridge with Africa. Her top diplomatic adviser, Fabrizio Saggio, pointed out that Italy secures the bulk of its critical minerals from China, which in turn has imported much of them from Africa — “and Sicily is 190 miles from Tunisia, so does that make any sense?”” Rewrite: “The strategy aims both to create economic opportunities that deter prospective migrants and to forge a strategic partnership with Africa. Her chief diplomatic adviser, Fabrizio Saggio, noted that Italy relies heavily on critical minerals from China, which sources many of them from Africa — questioning the logic of a short distance from Sicily to Tunisia.” Paragraph 17: “Meloni’s impact on E.U. policy in this area has been significant, an example of Italy having “force, weight and capacity,” as she put it.” Rewrite: “Meloni’s influence on EU policy in this domain has been substantial, demonstrating Italy’s “force, weight, and capacity,” as she described.” Paragraph 18: “That does not stop her using immigration as a means to provide red meat for her base, as in a recent outburst addressing the flow of migrants into Ceuta, a Spanish enclave on the Moroccan coast.” Rewrite: “Yet she continues to wield immigration as political leverage, as seen in a recent outburst concerning migrant flows into Ceuta, a Spanish enclave on Morocco’s coast.” Paragraph 19: “Nor does it stop her from quietly authorizing more than 450,000 visas for migrants to work in Italy’s fields and factories and to look after Europe’s oldest population. For Meloni, ideology is malleable, often ceding to realism.” Rewrite: “Nor does she refrain from quietly granting over 450,000 work visas for migrants to labor in Italy’s agriculture and industry, as well as to care for Europe’s aging population. For Meloni, ideology is flexible, often yielding to realism.” Paragraph 20: “With President Trump, an ideological ally, she thought this flexibility would pay dividends. She aimed to build on their shared nationalism and hostility to immigration, and also to ensure that the Western alliance remained functional.” Rewrite: “She anticipated that this flexibility would benefit her, aligning with President Trump — an ideological ally — to reinforce shared nationalism and anti‑immigration sentiment while preserving the functionality of the Western alliance.” Paragraph 21: “But in the face of provocations from the White House — an attack on Pope Leo; a Trump story that Meloni “begged” him for a photograph together — Meloni snapped: “Italy and I never beg.”” Rewrite: “However, faced with provocations from the White House — an attack on Pope Leo and a media report that Meloni “begged” him for a photo — she retorted, “Italy and I never beg.”” Paragraph 22: “She’d thought the relationship with Trump would be “easier,” she told me. But their shared values were eclipsed by Meloni’s single biggest foreign-policy objective: to overcome Italy’s longtime status as the least of the major powers.” Rewrite: “She had expected a smoother relationship with Trump, she told me, but their shared values were outweighed by her primary foreign‑policy goal: elevating Italy from its long‑standing role as a minor global power.” Paragraph 23: “She hasn’t spoken to Trump in several weeks and was unsure when they would.” Rewrite: “She has not spoken with Trump for several weeks and remains uncertain when they will next converse.” Paragraph 24: “The future of Europe” keep header. Paragraph 25: “Overall, her four years (and counting) in power suggest that, rather than the undoing of the E.U., as far-right parties like Meloni’s once threatened, something else may emerge: a Europe of nationalist rhetoric, ever harsher anti-immigrant measures, and a looser rather than more federal structure, but also one guided by realism.” Rewrite: “Overall, her four years — and counting — suggest that, instead of dismantling the EU as earlier far‑right movements threatened, a new Europe may emerge: one marked by nationalist rhetoric, increasingly stringent anti‑immigrant policies, a more decentralized rather than federal structure, yet guided by pragmatic realism.” Paragraph 26: “The E.U. has been perhaps the greatest peacemaking creation of the second half of the 20th century. That is too easily and too often forgotten. But the far right’s hostility to “ever closer union” does not in itself mean the end of union. As Meloni has learned, to govern is to adjust.” Rewrite: “The EU may be the most significant peace‑building achievement of the latter half of the 20th century, a fact often overlooked. While the far right’s opposition to “ever closer union” does not inevitably signal the union’s end, Meloni has shown that governance entails adaptation.” Now we need to output the title block: [TITLE] …
- Tunisia’s Civil Society Under Intensifying State Pressure as Crackdown Expands
- Broadcom Reports Wednesday. Its Profit Is Growing Nearly 4 Times as Fast as Its Revenue.
- ‘Really terrified’: Milo Yiannopoulos speaks out after deportation from US