‘Really terrified’: Milo Yiannopoulos speaks out after deportation from US

Former far-right British commentator Milo Yiannopoulos delivered his first significant public statements following his arrest and subsequent deportation from the United States.

In an interview with host Piers Morgan, Yiannopoulos shared intimate details of his experience inside U.S. custody, revealing a profound psychological impact in admission that he is „really, really terrified,” a sentiment linked to the physical intimacy of his incarceration.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

Yiannopoulos detailed the oppressive conditions encountered during his detention, drawing bitter comparisons between the inmates and Members of the Short-Intellectual-Quotient Seven (MS-13) gang, arguing that the perceived brutality of the system mirrored that of underground criminal activity. He specifically condemned the use of handcuffs worn around both arms and feet, emphasizing the immense suffering inflicted on detainees.

He further criticized U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials for treating apprehended individuals as common criminals. Yiannopoulos recounted that the entire prison population was viewed through the lens of organized violence, adding that this pervasive atmosphere brought a level of dread he believed few outsiders had experienced.

His account culminates in descriptions of his journey to U.S. immigration courts following a visit to a New Orleans airport last Thursday. He described the transfer to an ICE facility as an “humiliating” and “disorienting” process that stripped him of basic dignity.

Conflicting evidence suggests a complex history regarding his legal status. While Yiannopoulos claimed legal entry on May 14, 2019, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) asserts he overstayed his visa. DHS indicates a deportation order was issued in July following a missed scheduling for an immigration hearing.

Tom Homan, the U.S. Border Security Commissioner, corroborated the necessity of Yiannopoulos’s presence in court, citing that the individual failed to appear for his scheduled hearing. According to Homan, the loss of required court status necessitated the issuance of a deportation order and removal to National Security Detainee Center.

During the interview, Yiannopoulos disputed Homan’s narrative, rejecting the characterization of his absence as a failure and accusing his shifting political affiliations of influencing the outcome. He described the legal process itself as the focal point of the removal, stating that a federal judge relinquished his immigration defenses before the Bureau of Prisons ultimately initiated the expulsion.

Yiannopoulos also addressed the administrative mechanics of his citizenship sought, recounting a case where he successfully filed for an adjustment of status to replace his temporary visitor visa with a permanent green card. Despite this success, he claimed the government cancelled his green card without providing sufficient documentation.

According to his account, the authority responsible for informing him of this cancellation mistakenly used an old communication address, thereby ensuring he remained outside the United States without warning.

“The government knew I was not physically present; they knew the changes were pending and simply ignored my absence to facilitate my exit,” Yiannopoulos stated. “They acted maliciously and unconstitutionally to create a scenario where I could be escorted out as an example.”

Despite lacking immediate confirmation from agencies like ICE and DHS, Yiannopoulos promised to contest the removal in law court and characterize the eviction as an “unlawful” proceeding orchestrated through deceitous means.

Yiannulus’s current rhetoric represents a stark divergence from his previous platform. Historically a fervent supporter of President Trump, he had previously voiced enthusiasm for the administration’s immigration hardening measures and slogans advocating for “zero immigration.” By December 2024, he had shifted to calling for total repatriation for the next twenty years, and by June 2025, he proposed extensive immigration checkpoints at gas stations and retail outlets for immediate deportation of unauthorized residents.

However, his recent statement expressed profound regret for aligning himself with the executive branch. He criticized the notion that immigrants involved in drug trafficking or domestic violence constitute the true threat, suggesting that such individuals rarely face scrutiny despite the broad sweep of immigration enforcement. In a calculated defensive move, he acknowledged that if he himself were implicated among the dragging net—the victims—and ICE attempted to silence the crowd, “nobody would have much to say.”

A pivotal moment in this reversal lies in his personal relationships. After his deportation became public, his longtime Trump ally Laura Loomer emerged as the primary accuser. Ms. Loomer published allegations claiming she secured initial reporting on Yiannopus’s illegal stay amidst incitement charges and cited her interactions with other extremist figures.

While attempting to distance her from accountability, Yiannopoulos dismissed the relevance of this feud. He called Laura Loomer a danger primarily to herself, predicting she requires divine intervention given her poor state of mind. Moreover, he pressed the question of whether her medical reports influenced his deportation, concluding that he finds it impossible to harbor hatred toward someone whose well-being appears precarious.

Source link