Ben Keating Endorses Purpose‑Built GT3 Cars as the Right Path Forward

Le Mans 24‑Hours class champion Ben Keating has voiced strong support for the emerging generation of GT3 machinery, arguing that constructing a vehicle specifically for racing from the outset represents the correct approach.

Manufacturers such as Mercedes, Toyota and Genesis are now designing dedicated GT3 cars, prioritising race‑specific requirements over the features of accompanying road‑legal models.

This represents a significant philosophical shift in the production‑based category, originally intended to provide manufacturers and tuners with a cost‑effective path to adapt high‑performance sports cars into competitive race cars.

The evolution of GT3 has sparked debate, with concerns that purpose‑built race cars might increase costs and potentially limit accessibility for teams and drivers.

Keating previously guided a self‑entered Ford GT—the car itself primarily engineered for competition—to a GTE Am victory at Le Mans in 2019, before later being disqualified over an oversized fuel tank.

When asked about the new generation of cars such as the Toyota GR GT3, Keating told Motorsport.com, “I concur with the direction of the Toyota approach. I believe this is the right way to proceed.”

“If you want to design the very, very best GT3 car, you have to start with the race car. Figure out what it needs, what it wants, how to design it, and then fashion a road car after it. It’s easier than the other way around. So, we’ll see.”

“You have to start with the race car,” says Ben Keating

Photo by: Andreas Beil

Asked whether he would like to race the Toyota GT3 in the future, Keating added: “This is my 12th Le Mans in 10 different cars. I always like trying something different.”

“I really like the Toyota team. I’m a big Toyota dealer. Anything is possible.”

However, 13 Autosport’s Matt Bell believes the newer models run counter to the philosophy of GT3 racing, even if he expects traditional models such as the Corvette Z06 GT3.R to remain competitive under Balance of Performance.

“I remember the Ford GT was the same deal and that caused a lot of discord amongst a lot of manufacturers,” Bell told Motorsport.com. “It’s not really what GT racing is supposed to be about, but ultimately, we participate within the regulations that are set out by those that make them, and if it’s allowed by those guys, then we’ve all got to go racing.”

“Ultimately, BOP racing is designed to balance all cars. In theory, you can balance a Formula 1 car against a Corvette GT3 car in another fair lap.”

“So, that’s the side of things. That’s what it’s in the sport for. As long as that is generally enforced in the correct manner, which I think it is being done, then it’ll still be a fair competition.”

GT3 was conceived by SRO boss Stéphane Ratel exactly 20 years ago, and has since become the default category for production‑based racing.

Matt Bell argues it’s “not really what GT racing is supposed to be about”

Photo by: Germain Durand

But not every GT formula has enjoyed the same longevity. GT1 died under its own weight in the 1990s due to rising costs, and its revived version was officially phased out in 2012.

Similarly, declining manufacturer involvement and the arrival of the Hypercar class led to the demise of GTE, which originally began life as GT2, after 2023.

Bell stressed that it’s important for manufacturers to keep costs under control to secure the long‑term future of GT3 racing.

“I’m not too concerned, but it’s a trend that I would not like to see become the norm in the long term, because with that, the costs go through the roof,” he said.

“There’s always a cycle. GT1 was amazing for a while. It died because it got too expensive. GT2 did the same. It would be nice if GT3 is the last solution in terms of GT racing we have for as long as my career lasts, I’m sure.”

“So, as long as that’s kept under control, I think it will be fine.”

Source link