Ten years after voters in the United Kingdom chose to leave the European Union, supporters still herald the decision as a pivotal exercise of sovereignty. Critics, however, highlight the ensuing economic setbacks and deepening political divisions.
This week, RFI explores the 2016 referendum’s legacy through the perspectives of three analysts: Federico Fabbrini of the Dublin‑based Brexit Institute, Robert Oulds from London’s pro‑Brexit Bruges Group, and John Barry of Queen’s University Belfast.
Their assessments illustrate a nation still split over what Brexit has delivered, what it has cost, and what it portends for the UK’s future ties with Europe.
For supporters, the promised “control” feels achieved, while opponents cite mounting economic repercussions and an increasingly fractured political landscape.
Between these poles lies a nuanced reality, informed by trade, immigration, the Northern Ireland situation, and the oft‑promoted notion of “Global Britain.”
Also Read
- German Psychiatrist Jailed for Life After Deadly Magdeburg Christmas Market Attack
- Elon Musk Promotes Controversial Anti-Immigration Film ‘Citizen Vigilante’ on X
- Market Volatility: Is a Shift Toward Low-Cost AI Driving the Tech Sell-Off?
- Bayer Wins Supreme Court Roundup Ruling, But Legal Battles Remain


