Parliament Speaker Condemns Protracted Restoration Delays and Safety Risks

Sir Lindsay expressed concern over the absence of a fire‑suppressing mist system across the building, noting that he has been advocating for its installation for years.

“The most significant and historic sections of the building still lack this system, which is essential for safety.”

When asked about reports suggesting a parliamentary vote on the restoration plan could be held before the end of 2026, Sir Lindsay stated that such a decision rested with the government’s business managers.

“It remains uncertain when the proposal will be brought forward; we will see what the House decides,” he remarked.

The 19th‑century building’s wiring and piping largely date from the 1940s, with some infrastructure even older, dating back to the Victorian era, a situation highlighted in a report a decade ago that warned of an “impending crisis.” The assessment also identified fire‑safety deficiencies and extensive asbestos contamination.

The BBC has learned that government whips have discussed arranging a debate and vote on the restoration plans by the start of the new year, though no specific date has been set.

The upcoming vote will determine whether to move forward with up to £3 billion of initial works and will narrow the selection to four current options, paving the way for a final decision by 2030.

One proposal envisions MPs and peers vacating the site for up to 24 years beginning in 2032, with projected costs reaching £15.6 billion.

A second option entails relocating only the House of Lords from the building, an undertaking estimated at £39 billion and expected to span 61 years.

The chairman of the body responsible for Parliament’s refurbishment defended the projected expenses earlier this year, telling the BBC, “We are already spending £150 million annually just to keep the building standing.”

Source link