Ishwaree Datta examines how solid tumor cells endure immune pressure during macrophage-mediated trogocytosis.
Image credit:AACR Professional Photographer, ©iStock.com, 3dMediSphere
Ishwaree Datta is a postdoctoral researcher at the University of California, Santa Barbara, investigating how solid tumors adapt to evade immune system attacks. In this Postdoc Portrait interview, she discusses how cancer cells resist host immune responses and how she aims to exploit those stress responses to uncover therapeutic vulnerabilities.
Decoding Immune Attacks and Cancer Cell Adaptation
Q | What drew you to cancer and the immune system?
My scientific journey began in a microbiology lab, where I studied how bacteria acquire iron in nutrient‑poor conditions. I was fascinated by how a single‑cell organism solves the problem of survival under scarcity. The underlying question—how something small and vulnerable persists in a hostile environment—has guided my work across different systems. In graduate school I used fruit flies to explore tumor growth and treatment resistance. Now, as a postdoctoral fellow, I study human cancer cells and immune cells in ovarian cancer models. The experimental systems have changed, but the central question remains the same.
When I first observed trogocytosis—the process whereby macrophages repeatedly bite into tumor cells—I noticed that the cancer cells survived and continued to divide. This highlighted a clinically devastating gap: we still do not fully understand how a cancer cell can withstand an immune attack and live to fight another day. Elucidating this mechanism and finding ways to disrupt it have become the focus of my research, with the goal of developing more effective immunotherapies.
Q | What scientific problem are you trying to solve?
Cancer immunotherapy has transformed care for many patients, yet most solid tumors eventually find a way to survive. We still lack a clear understanding of how cancer cells evade immune‑mediated death. My work asks a simple but critical question: What happens to a cancer cell that is attacked by the immune system but does not die? To answer this, I examine the molecular changes in cancer cells that survive macrophage trogocytosis. These surviving cells appear to activate stress‑response pathways that may help them endure future immune assaults, potentially driving relapse and therapy resistance. By deciphering how cancer cells persist after immune injury, I hope to identify druggable vulnerabilities that could be targeted with existing agents or combination strategies, converting incomplete immune responses into durable cures.
Overcoming Resistance to Immunotherapy in Solid Tumors
Q | What’s one thing you learned from cancer cell survival that you didn’t expect?
Initially, I assumed that the outcome of macrophage‑tumor interactions would be dictated primarily by immune cell efficiency—how well macrophages engage, how much tumor membrane they remove via trogocytosis, and how many bites are needed to trigger cell death. The data, however, revealed a surprising degree of agency on the part of the cancer cells.
When I examined tumor cells that had survived trogocytosis, I found they were not passive victims awaiting a lethal blow. Instead, the attacked cancer cells rapidly mounted stress responses, rewired their metabolism, and upregulated survival signals within minutes of the attack.
This discovery shifted my research focus from merely enhancing macrophage killing power to blocking the adaptive pathways that tumor cells use to evade immunotherapy. Identifying those targetable mechanisms now drives my work.
Q | If your research succeeds, what could it change for science or society?
Understanding why solid tumors recur after immunotherapy could lead to combination treatments that prevent cancer cells from adapting to immune attack in the first place, thereby improving long‑term outcomes for patients.
Q | What question are you most excited to answer next?
I aim to determine whether the cancer cells that survive immunotherapy are the same ones that seed relapse. If they are, elucidating the targetable survival mechanisms they employ would become a leading avenue for therapeutic intervention.
Responses have been edited for length and clarity.
Also Read
- White House Official Alleges China’s K3 Model Derived from Anthropic Technology
- Crypto Legislation Faces Clashing Demands Over Presidential Equity and Industry Regulation[/TITLE avont]A comprehensive cryptocurrency bill is poised for a final Senate vote this summer, drawing backing from Republicans and select Democrats, and has received significant support کارت from an industry that has invested tens of millions to influence its provisions.The debate has intensified following the disclosure of $1.4 billion in crypto revenue by former President Trump in June, highlighting the substantial earnings his family network generates through digital‑currency ventures.Senate Democrats are insisting on stringent language that would prohibit public officials from selling or endorsing cryptocurrencies. On Wednesday, Republican senators released a revised draft that explicitly bars the president and other U.S. officials from issuing or sponsoring digital currencies while in office.Progressive advocacy groups countered that the draft falls short of preventing former president Trump from profiting through crypto. With the midterm elections looming, the controversy threatens to derail the bill, underscoring how Trump’s crypto dealings have permeated Washington politics.“The ethical dimension has become the linchpin of bipartisan support,” said Cody Carbone, chief ágExecutive of the Digital Chamber, a trade group in the crypto sector. “Democrats view nennt this as their paramount concern.”Passing the Clarity Act remains a top priority for the crypto community. Under the Biden administration, the Securities and Exchange Commission aggressively prosecuted crypto firms, arguing that digital assets should fall under securities regulation. The Trump administration largely halted those suits, shifting regulatory tone.The act, which passed the House last year, would codify this regulatory approach, ensuring that crypto companies can operate with predictable oversight regardless of future administrations.Democrats have long critised the bill for potentially delegating oversight to a federal agency that critics say lacks sufficient enforcement capacity.Trump’s crypto ventures have become a focal point of scrutiny. His latest mandatory financial disclosure revealed earnings exceeding $2 billion in the first year of his second term, predominantly from crypto transactions.These winds have come at the expense of ordinary investors, who collectively lost $3.8 billion after purchasing Trump’s high‑volatility memecoin.The latest draft of the Clarity Act does not preclude Trump from continuing toENCIL profit from his memecoin or other crypto enterprises, according to Democratic staffers and independent experts who reviewed the language.“The Senate’s proposal would effectively do nothing to curb the mechanisms by which Mr. Trump has historically generated wealth—or could in the future,” said Scott Greytak, deputy executive director of Transparency International U.S. “Key business structures, revenue streams, and family arrangements would remain beyond regulatory reach.”The Clarity Act is the fruit of sustained lobbying by the crypto sector. During the 2024 election cycle, pro‑crypto super PACs expended over $130 million to elect legislators supportive of the industry. The effort has borne fruit: last July, Trump signed the GENIUS Act, a pro‑crypto statute governing stablecoins, and the House passed a version of the Clarity Act.The legislation confronted resistance in the Senate, hack from the banking lobby, but a bipartisan Senate Banking Committee vote in May cleared it for the full chamber.A Senate vote is due shortly, with only weeks remaining before the August recess, widely seen as the critical deadline for Congress to enact the bill before the midterms.Political dynamics complicate the bill’s path. Republicans possess a slim Senate majority, making Democratic support essential for passage, while Trump’s crypto activities have intensified scrutiny even among industry‑friendly Democrats.The ethics language presented on Wednesday emerged from negotiations between Senate Republicans and the White House, which has endorsed the reform. A White House spokesperson branded it “快the most comprehensive and wide‑ranging ethics provision in history” and noted the administration had “bent over backward” to find a compromise.Critics highlighted potential loopholes, labeling them “laughable.” The bill prohibits public officials from issuing or promoting digital currencies while in office and extends the restriction to spouses, but not to children.The restrictions are unlikely to significantly limit Trump’s crypto income. Two of his largest ventures were launched shortly before his presidency, one within 72 hours of his inauguration.Moreover, the rule’s validity ceases in January 2029, meaning a future Justice Department would be barred from prosecuting Trump forтіпviolations, experts warn.Despite these concerns,Compass Senate Republicans praised the language as a historic accord that addressed Democratic apprehensions.“History will remember this as the moment a president chose a higher standard of ethics than the law required,” Senator Cynthia Lummis, Republican of Wyoming, said on Wednesday.
- Breakthrough 3D Innovation Unveiled for Playdate Console
- Revealing Faces of Antiquity: 16 Roman-Era Hungarian Lives Brought to Light Through Forensic Reconstruction


