SEOUL, South Korea — A South Korean court issued a ruling on Friday ordering SK Group Chairman Chey Tae-won to pay his former wife 944 billion won (approximately $640 million) in a legal battle frequently described by local media as the “divorce of the century.”
The decision from the Seoul High Court follows a Supreme Court mandate for the appellate court to conduct a further review of the divorce proceedings between Chey and Roh So-yeong, the daughter of the late South Korean President Roh Tae-woo.
The final settlement awarded to Roh, who serves as a director for a Seoul art museum, is less than the 1.38 trillion won ($940 million) previously mandated by the high court last year. Additionally, Chey had been ordered to pay 2 billion won ($1.3 million) in alimony.
The financial landscape of the case has shifted as the value of Chey’s holdings has grown, driven largely by the surge in SK Hynix shares amid the global expansion of artificial intelligence.
A key component of the high court’s previous ruling involved findings that Roh’s father had allegedly provided SK with 30 billion won ($20.4 million) in slush funds during his presidency. However, the Supreme Court later determined that these funds could not be legally classified as a contribution to the company’s corporate growth.
Chey and Roh married in 1988 and have three children. The legal separation began in 2017 after Chey sought a divorce following the disclosure of an extramarital relationship and the birth of a child from that union.
Neither Chey nor Roh, who was absent from Friday’s proceedings, attended the hearing. The case may return to the Supreme Court should either party file a further appeal.
Chey is currently among a delegation of South Korean business leaders traveling to the United States with President Lee Jae Myung. The delegation is scheduled to meet with prominent U.S. technology executives in San Francisco, including Nvidia’s Jensen Huang, OpenAI’s Sam Altman, and Anthropic’s Dario Amodei, to advocate for investment in South Korean semiconductor and AI sectors.
Also Read
- Assessing Democratic Shifts Under Italy’s Leadership
- Six Candidates Compete to Succeed Guterres as UN Secretary-General
- South African President Secures Court Injunction to Suspend Impeachment Inquiry</TITLE]On Friday, Western Cape High Court Judge Andre le Grange suspended the parliamentary committee’s ability to proceed with its hearings. The court ruled that proceedings must be stayed “pending the determination by this court of the applicant’s review,” referring to President Ramaphosa’s ongoing legal challenge against the panel.The decision provides President Ramaphosa with crucial time as he seeks to clear his name regarding the allegations. During the hearing, his legal counsel argued that allowing the impeachment committee to continue its work before his separate legal review is resolved could result in irreparable damage to his reputation.The matter was heard by a panel of three judges, with a majority ruling in the President’s favor. This verdict ensures that the impeachment proceedings cannot move forward until his other legal case has reached a final conclusion.The controversy stems from a 2020 robbery at the President’s private farm in Phala Phala, located in the Limpopo province. During the incident, thieves reportedly stole approximately $580,000 (£430,000) in US currency, which had been hidden inside a sofa.The details of the theft surfaced two years later when former intelligence chief Arthur Fraser submitted an explosive dossier to the police. Fraser, a prominent ally of former President Jacob Zuma, accused Ramaphosa of failing to report the theft to both law enforcement and tax authorities.Because the stolen funds were in foreign currency, the incident has also raised concerns regarding potential violations of exchange control laws. Ramaphosa has maintained that the cash was proceeds from the sale of buffaloes.Following the court’s decision, the President issued a statement noting that he “respects” the ruling.Additional reporting by Pumza Fihlani in Johannesburg
- Moscow Launches Missile Assault on Kyiv Amid Escalating Drone Strikes
![South African President Secures Court Injunction to Suspend Impeachment Inquiry</TITLE]On Friday, Western Cape High Court Judge Andre le Grange suspended the parliamentary committee’s ability to proceed with its hearings. The court ruled that proceedings must be stayed “pending the determination by this court of the applicant’s review,” referring to President Ramaphosa’s ongoing legal challenge against the panel.The decision provides President Ramaphosa with crucial time as he seeks to clear his name regarding the allegations. During the hearing, his legal counsel argued that allowing the impeachment committee to continue its work before his separate legal review is resolved could result in irreparable damage to his reputation.The matter was heard by a panel of three judges, with a majority ruling in the President’s favor. This verdict ensures that the impeachment proceedings cannot move forward until his other legal case has reached a final conclusion.The controversy stems from a 2020 robbery at the President’s private farm in Phala Phala, located in the Limpopo province. During the incident, thieves reportedly stole approximately 0,000 (£430,000) in US currency, which had been hidden inside a sofa.The details of the theft surfaced two years later when former intelligence chief Arthur Fraser submitted an explosive dossier to the police. Fraser, a prominent ally of former President Jacob Zuma, accused Ramaphosa of failing to report the theft to both law enforcement and tax authorities.Because the stolen funds were in foreign currency, the incident has also raised concerns regarding potential violations of exchange control laws. Ramaphosa has maintained that the cash was proceeds from the sale of buffaloes.Following the court’s decision, the President issued a statement noting that he “respects” the ruling.Additional reporting by Pumza Fihlani in Johannesburg](https://i3.wp.com/ichef.bbci.co.uk/ace/branded_news/1200/cpsprodpb/1b0b/live/5f10c1f0-873b-11f1-a10e-a5d4f08bc20c.jpg?w=1024&resize=1024,1024&ssl=1 "South African President Secures Court Injunction to Suspend Impeachment Inquiry</TITLE]On Friday, Western Cape High Court Judge Andre le Grange suspended the parliamentary committee’s ability to proceed with its hearings. The court ruled that proceedings must be stayed “pending the determination by this court of the applicant’s review,” referring to President Ramaphosa’s ongoing legal challenge against the panel.The decision provides President Ramaphosa with crucial time as he seeks to clear his name regarding the allegations. During the hearing, his legal counsel argued that allowing the impeachment committee to continue its work before his separate legal review is resolved could result in irreparable damage to his reputation.The matter was heard by a panel of three judges, with a majority ruling in the President’s favor. This verdict ensures that the impeachment proceedings cannot move forward until his other legal case has reached a final conclusion.The controversy stems from a 2020 robbery at the President’s private farm in Phala Phala, located in the Limpopo province. During the incident, thieves reportedly stole approximately 0,000 (£430,000) in US currency, which had been hidden inside a sofa.The details of the theft surfaced two years later when former intelligence chief Arthur Fraser submitted an explosive dossier to the police. Fraser, a prominent ally of former President Jacob Zuma, accused Ramaphosa of failing to report the theft to both law enforcement and tax authorities.Because the stolen funds were in foreign currency, the incident has also raised concerns regarding potential violations of exchange control laws. Ramaphosa has maintained that the cash was proceeds from the sale of buffaloes.Following the court’s decision, the President issued a statement noting that he “respects” the ruling.Additional reporting by Pumza Fihlani in Johannesburg")
