The UN’s Anti-Israel Consensus: Why the Organization Deserves a New Name

Consider the current geopolitical dynamics unfolding in New York.

The president of Iran, a nation in direct geopolitical conflict with the United States, is permitted to enter American soil, receive the security afforded to a visiting head of state, and address the General Assembly.

Now, contrast this with Israel’s treatment.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu makes an extraordinarily brief visit, arriving, addressing the assembly, and departing within hours.

This follows months of the New York mayor publicly discussing his potential arrest and making clear that Netanyahu was unwelcome in the city.

Reflect on that disparity.

The Iranian president enjoys the protections of a head of state and speaks freely at the UN.

Israel’s prime minister, America’s closest ally in the Middle East, enters New York under intense hostility, stays only hours, and departs.

That contrast should arrest everyone’s attention.

Examine the proceedings inside the UN itself.

From the opening day of the General Assembly, speech after speech has turned toward Israel: Turkey, Jordan, Qatar, France, Britain, Brazil, and the secretary-general himself.

Different continents, religions, political systems, and national interests.

Yet they consistently find common ground in condemning Israel.

The world faces raging wars, dictatorships crushing their own people, political prisoners, persecuted minorities, women denied basic rights, and openly operating terror groups.

Iran poses a direct threat to America and the West, yet when nations gather, the recurring target remains Israel.

Again and again.

This is where the institution’s name begins to take on a different meaning.

The UN seems unable to unite on almost any other issue.

But place Israel at the center, and the nations suddenly discover unity.

Perhaps it is time to call the institution what it has become: UNAI – United Nations Against Israel.

Because increasingly, that is the only unity they share.

Not unity against terrorism, regimes threatening neighbors, or persecuted minorities and political prisoners.

But unity against Israel.

It is especially painful to witness this in the institution created in the aftermath of World War II and the Holocaust.

For thousands of years, Jews lived in other people’s countries.

They were persecuted, expelled, and massacred, often blamed for problems they did not create.

Jews were forced from their homelands

Time and again, the countries Jews called home decided they no longer belonged.

Then came the Holocaust.

Six million Jews were murdered.

The world looked at the ashes of Europe and vowed, “Never again.”

Eventually, the Jewish people regained what had been denied for generations: their own country.

A tiny country.

A place where Jewish children would no longer depend entirely on another government’s willingness to protect them.

A place where Jews could finally defend themselves.

Yet even that has not ended the obsession.

For centuries, Jews were attacked for living among nations.

Now, back in their homeland, the hostility has followed them.

This time, the Jewish state itself is placed on trial.

October 7 should have been the ultimate reminder of why Israel exists: Jews were slaughtered in their homes, families murdered, and children, parents, and grandparents taken hostage.

For once in Jewish history, those victims had a sovereign country capable of fighting back.

And what happened?

The world’s attention quickly shifted from the attacked Jews to the Jewish state defending itself.

Now, return to New York.

Look at the picture again: Iran’s president enters the US and stands at the UN podium, but Israel’s prime minister arrives in the same city after months of public hostility from its mayor, speaks, and leaves within hours.

Then, inside the hall, country after country takes its turn attacking and condemning Israel.

Take a moment to truly digest that.

The UN was supposed to represent a world that had learned from history.

Instead, one of its most consistent forms of international unity has become opposition to the one country created so the Jewish people would never again be homeless and defenseless.

That is the eye-opener.

The nations may be divided on almost everything else, but when it comes to Israel, they suddenly know exactly how to unite.

Perhaps it is time to stop pretending the name means something else.

Call it what it has become.

UNAI: United Nations Against Israel.

Source link