Ugandan Judiciary Rejects Lawyers’ Directive to Abandon Colonial-Era Court Traditions

Uganda’s judiciary has formally opposed a directive from the Uganda Law Society (ULS) that sought to eliminate traditional courtroom titles and ceremonial practices, deeming them legacies of colonial rule.

The ULS had instructed its members to discontinue addressing judges as “My Lord” or “My Lady” and to cease bowing before judicial officers, arguing these customs perpetuate hierarchical and colonial-era dynamics. In a statement, the society asserted that such practices undermine the principle that citizens are the ultimate employers of public officials, contributing to systemic judicial failures.

Judiciary spokesperson James Ereemye responded by emphasizing the courts’ autonomy, stating the ULS lacks authority to dictate judicial conduct. He criticized the association as misrepresenting administrative priorities and reiterated the judiciary’s commitment to maintaining “established decorum” in legal proceedings. Ereemye underscored that challenges to courtroom traditions should be addressed through formal policy channels rather than unilateral directives.

The debate reflects broader discussions across Africa about aligning judicial customs with contemporary values. Countries like Kenya, Zimbabwe, Malawi, and Ghana have similarly questioned the relevance of inherited British legal traditions, including ceremonial attire and formal address protocols. While some advocate for “decolonizing” court practices to restore dignity and equality, others argue these conventions uphold institutional neutrality and respect.

Source link