
There is a familiar pattern to these pivotal diplomatic moments, and Washington’s foreign policy establishment continues to overlook the broader implications: when a president grows dissatisfied with an alliance relationship that isn’t delivering expected returns, they wield the most disruptive tool available—direct engagement with adversaries. Rather than responding with alarm about “chaos” and “unpredictability,” the more pertinent question is what systemic shifts this actually represents.
Also Read
- 2026 BMW Championship Preview: Field, Odds, and Picks for FedEx Cup Playoffs Second Leg
- Kim Yo-jong Dismisses Reduced US-South Korea Drills as Provocative Gesture
- Trump to Meet Kim Jong Un in 2026 Ahead of APEC Summit
- Canine Eye Issues Spark Massive Food Recall After Nearly 200 Reports of Potential Vision Loss
