Cornell assault lawsuit exposes New York’s progressive reputation and dated rape laws

Last month, a woman identified as Jane Doe filed a lawsuit against Cornell University, the Chi Phi fraternity and seven fraternity members, accusing them of gang-raping her on the night of October 19, 2024.

The allegations have triggered a nationwide conversation about the prevalence of sexual assault on U.S. college campuses.

They have also renewed efforts to reform New York state law, particularly rules that survivors say make it harder to obtain justice.

Although New York has often presented itself as a leader on women’s rights, advocates argue that sexual-assault survivors still face significant legal barriers when seeking accountability.

Erica Vladimer, a lawyer and founding director of Harassment-Free New York, a survivor-led nonprofit, told Al Jazeera that much of the legislation now in the public eye is the result of years, and in some cases decades, of advocacy.

“These are bills that we have been fighting for for years when sexual violence is not in the news,” Vladimer said.

She distinguished the current wave of public concern from the #MeToo movement, which began in 2017 as an online campaign against sexual misconduct.

“It speaks to the fact that the #MeToo movement is not dead. It is a movement, not a moment,” Vladimer said.

State leaders in Albany have already signalled their intention to respond to the Cornell case.

On Wednesday, the New York Assembly said it had formed a working group to review the state’s sexual-assault laws and prepare recommendations for the 2027 legislative session.

Still, advocates said more concrete reforms are needed to address the crisis.

“I appreciate that this work is happening,” said Lindsey Boylan, a New York City Council candidate. “It doesn’t undo the fact that rape culture is pervasive in the United States and very much so alive and well in New York.”

Boylan was the first woman to publicly accuse former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo of sexual harassment in another high-profile misconduct case, back in 2020. She is among those calling for deeper reform.

Advocates are pressing state lawmakers to adopt or amend several key measures.

Closing the voluntary-intoxication loophole

The Cornell case has renewed attention on New York’s “voluntary intoxication” statute, a legal provision that can make it harder to prosecute sexual assault when a person has voluntarily consumed alcohol or drugs.

New York Governor Kathy Hochul said on Friday that she would work with lawmakers to close the gap.

“It should not matter whether they chose to use drugs or alcohol. Voluntary intoxication is not a license for sexual assault or gang rape. Period,” Hochul said.

Under current New York law, a person who voluntarily drinks or uses drugs is not considered “mentally incapacitated” during an assault, even if they are too intoxicated to consent.

That distinction can make it more difficult for prosecutors to bring sex-crime charges. The law generally recognizes incapacitation in sexual-assault cases when a person is involuntarily intoxicated, unconscious or otherwise “physically helpless.”

The issue has become central to the Cornell case. Doe has acknowledged that she consumed substances before the alleged rape, saying she was pressured to drink alcohol and take the dissociative drug ketamine.

The Tompkins County district attorney initially declined to bring charges, citing the statute’s treatment of “voluntary intoxication.” The investigation has since been reopened amid public pressure.

New York is one of 19 U.S. states that distinguish between voluntary and involuntary intoxication when determining consent in sexual-violence cases.

But the Cornell case has spurred efforts to remove that distinction from the law. Critics argue that sexual assault is no less serious when a victim is drunk or has used drugs.

“I mean, to have New York, a supposedly progressive state, penalise people who are sexually abused for drinking is disgusting,” Boylan told Al Jazeera.

Vladimer said that treating voluntary and involuntary intoxication differently can shift the focus from perpetrators to victims.

“We essentially have codified victim-blaming by saying if you become voluntarily intoxicated and then are sexually assaulted, you essentially cannot seek justice in our court system,” Vladimer told Al Jazeera.

In June, the New York State Senate unanimously passed a bill that would allow sexual-assault charges regardless of whether a victim is voluntarily or involuntarily intoxicated.

The legislation has not yet been taken up by the State Assembly.

Expanding rape-shield protections

New York’s rape-shield laws restrict the use of a complainant’s sexual history and conduct in criminal cases. Those protections, however, do not currently extend to civil proceedings.

That distinction could matter in the Cornell case because Doe brought a civil lawsuit.

Vladimer said that questions about a survivor’s behavior could arise during civil discovery and at trial.

“There is the potential of her having to face questions about things like her sexual history,” Vladimer said.

Bridie Farrell, the director of victim-rights advocacy and legislation at the law firm Weitz and Luxenberg, told Al Jazeera that she has seen stark differences in how male and female survivors are questioned in civil cases where this practice is still allowed.

In one case involving a brother and sister who were both sexually assaulted, Farrell said the man was not questioned about his sexual history while the woman was “grilled on it.”

A bill sponsored by State Senator Liz Krueger would extend rape-shield protections to civil proceedings. The measure passed the Senate in June and is now before the Assembly Judiciary Committee.

Curbing retaliatory defamation suits

Advocates are also pushing for legislation to stop retaliatory defamation lawsuits against people who report sexual misconduct.

Boylan said she has spent more than $2 million defending herself in legal proceedings connected to her accusations against Cuomo, who resigned as New York governor in 2021.

He has repeatedly denied wrongdoing, even though a state attorney general’s report concluded that he “engaged in conduct constituting sexual harassment.”

“Every step of the way, we have a system that penalises people for speaking up about their own harm,” Boylan said.

Boylan and Charlotte Bennett, a former aide who also accused Cuomo of sexual harassment, support the Speak Your Truth Act, which would provide legal protections for people who publicly report sexual assault, harassment or discrimination.

The bill, sponsored by Assembly member Jessica Gonzalez-Rojas, would make certain communications about sexual assault, harassment or discrimination privileged when made without malice.

It would also allow survivors who successfully defend themselves against defamation lawsuits to recover legal fees and costs. The bill remains in an Assembly committee.

A recent win, but a longer road ahead

For Bridie Farrell, a victim’s-rights advocate, the push for legal change is personal.

Farrell said she was a 15-year-old competitive speed skater in 1997 when she was sexually abused by a 33-year-old teammate and mentor. She became public with her abuse in 2013.

By that time, the statute of limitations in her case had expired. Farrell later became an advocate for changing New York’s laws, helping pass the Child Victims Act in 2019, which extended the time available for survivors of childhood sexual abuse to pursue criminal and civil claims.

The law allowed Farrell to file her own case in 2020. She told Al Jazeera that a trial has now been scheduled for June 2027.

“Before we passed the Child Victims Act in 2019, New York was one of the worst in the country,” Farrell said of the environment for sexual-assault survivors seeking justice.

Farrell said the legal obstacles in Doe’s case, including the voluntary-intoxication statute, were foreseeable. “I’m not surprised if we haven’t updated a law that is archaic,” she said.

Lawmakers have nonetheless signalled openness to reform. In announcing the Assembly working group, Speaker Carl Heastie said the state would “thoughtfully” consider how to strengthen its laws.

“The allegations being reported out of Cornell University are truly horrifying,” Heastie said on Wednesday. “We want to do everything we can to ensure victims of sexual assault see justice served.”

Survivors and sexual-violence advocates say the Cornell case points to problems that extend beyond any single statute. They hope for broader systemic and cultural change.

“Changing legislation is incredibly important. But legislation in a lot of cases can only go [as far as] the paper that it’s written on,” Boylan said. “It would be amiss to orient this horrible, tragic, unacceptable, infuriating case in isolation without looking at the broader rape culture of our state and our country.”

Source link