Former President Donald Trump addressed the 2026 Republican National Convention at the American Airlines Center in Dallas, Texas, on September 9, 2026.
Alex Wong | Getty Images
During a period of widespread financial strain, former President Donald Trump has pledged a $5,000 election “dividend” check to every adult in the U.S., contingent on Republican control of Congress following the midterm elections.
However, economists contacted by CNBC voice doubts about the proposal’s viability. They contend that even if enacted, a one-time direct payment would do little to alleviate affordability pressures and could instead intensify inflation in the near term.
With the November midterms approaching and consumer sentiment largely pessimistic due to high prices, Trump’s announcement has sparked debate. Analysis from PNC Financial Services highlights that inflation is a key factor in the long-term decline in consumer confidence.
In recent months, consumers’ short-term outlook has deteriorated further, as reported by the Conference Board. Similarly, the University of Michigan’s consumer survey indicates worsening sentiment amid fears of persistent inflation.
Economists argue that direct payments are inherently inflationary, potentially driving prices higher and undermining the intended stimulus effect.
“This proposal lacks economic rationale,” stated Brian Bethune, an economics professor at Boston College. “Adding spending to existing supply constraints will only exacerbate the issue.”
The Inflationary Risks of Stimulus Checks
With oil prices surpassing $100 per barrel due to ongoing conflicts and trade tensions, supply-side factors are already pressuring prices, according to Bethune.
“Injecting more spending into a supply-constrained economy is counterproductive,” Bethune added. “It’s akin to bailing water from a boat while drilling a hole in its底.”
Recent history supports this view: during the COVID-19 pandemic, extensive fiscal stimulus contributed to a 2.6 percentage point rise in U.S. inflation, per Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis research.
Economists note that the 2021 American Rescue Plan indirectly increased prices by boosting consumer spending. The consumer price index peaked at 9.1% in June 2022, the highest since 1981, though it has since moderated to 3.4%.
“While stimulus checks were popular during the pandemic and many would welcome a $5,000 check now amid cost-of-living struggles, the short-term benefit would be followed by long-term consequences,” said Heather Long, chief economist at Navy Federal Credit Union. “It would worsen inflation and increase borrowing costs for homes, vehicles, credit cards, and businesses.”
In response to inquiries about inflationary effects, White House spokesman Davis Ingle told CNBC that Trump “has consistently defied expectations, contrasting with the Democrats’ record of historic inflation.”
Pushing the Economy Toward Crisis
As inflation remains above the Federal Reserve’s 2% target, speculation grows about potential rate hikes in the upcoming September meeting.
“The Fed should consider raising rates due to heightened risks of sustained inflation,” Long noted. “Ultimately, prices continue to rise.”
Meanwhile, elevated borrowing costs and increases in essentials like groceries and gasoline have become major pain points for households.
However, distributing “mad money” estimated to exceed $1 trillion is ill-advised, according to Bethune. “This would inflate the deficit, with the Fed facing inflation above target, pushing the economy toward a crisis.”
The U.S. national deficit approached $1.8 trillion in August, as reported by the Treasury Department.
“Such payments would exacerbate the federal deficit, boost inflation, raise interest rates, and weaken the overall economy,” added Brett House, an economics professor at Columbia Business School.
Nevertheless, Trump’s latest pledge is unlikely to materialize as policy, House said. While Trump has previously suggested direct distributions, including a $5,000 “DOGE dividend” and a $2,000 “tariff rebate,” neither came to pass.
“Even if Trump fulfills this promise, a politically motivated initiative could face legal challenges or be reversed through future taxation,” House concluded.
Also Read
- Iran-backed terror group’s latest territorial grab threatens second global shipping chokepoint
- The West Must Confront the UAE’s Emerging Role as a Haven for Hostile State Activity
- Morocco Rejects Allegations of Complicity in Deadly Ceuta Migrant Surge
- Sekisui Chemical Set to Acquire Australian Builder Ausbuild Group in $335 Million Deal

