The NFL Players Association holds significant leverage in conversations about a new Collective Bargaining Agreement, primarily due to the time factor.
The existing agreement spans the next five seasons, and the NFLPA cannot be compelled to negotiate until it expires.
Given the NFL’s desire to secure a new deal sooner rather than later, the message is straightforward: initiatives must be compelling enough to warrant immediate action.
On Thursday’s edition of The Rich Eisen Show, NFLPA Executive Director JC Tretter addressed the question of whether a new CBA could be negotiated within the next year.
“I would say extremely unlikely,” Tretter said. “I became president during COVID, which I think taught me to really view things in foreseeable chunks of time. As you move too far forward, there’s too many variables to deal with. I was elected in March, started April 1st. The first part of my job is making sure I understand what our members want, because this is a membership‑ran institution.”
“I will not be able to do that until throughout this season as I go and visit each of these 32 teams. So there is nothing that could be done until I talk to my guys and make sure I understand what they want and what they’re looking for. And then that’s also understanding, can I get everybody on the same page in that amount of time? Which is probably a difficult ask as well.”
“So I think my first step is getting out and talking to all 2,500 members and making sure I understand what they care about, and then getting our guys to understand what we should be fighting for. And that’s gonna come from their feedback. There’s gonna be a lot of work that goes on by me and the staff and then bringing that to the executive committee and bringing that to the board [of player representatives] and making sure they have a say, making sure they understand the trade‑offs and what the discussions would be.”
“So there’s a ton of work to be done before a conversation could even start happening, let alone going through an entire collective bargaining process. Those aren’t one‑month discussions. This is a 500‑plus‑page document of clause after clause after clause that would need to be negotiated. That is a very heavy lift on that timeline to get anything done.”
Tretter’s assessment is justified. Even if the league presented a generous offer now, building the consensus among the executive committee, board of player representatives, and the rank‑and‑file remains challenging.
“We have an agreement in place for the next five years; it’s not a matter of rushing to complete it,” Tretter said. “The focus isn’t on how quickly we can get it done but on whether we even want to discuss the terms that might be proposed. With the current deal satisfying us, there is no incentive to accelerate the process,” he added.
The prospect of a work stoppage seems premature at this stage.
“I think we’re still so far away from that,” Tretter noted. “While discussions have started swiftly and the NFL has signaled interest, the forthcoming five‑year horizon underscores that any work stoppage or strike remains distant.”
Consequently, the union will hold its position. Nevertheless, an opportune moment to secure a more favourable deal may be missed; deciding when to accept the league’s terms becomes a strategic challenge.

