Echoes of Transactional Politics: Persistence of Clientelism in Post-Mexican Governance
Mexico City
|‘),
Oct. 15, 2026, 1:41 p.m. ET
</span>
|
4 min read
</p>
<p>After casting ballots under the watchful eye of a political‑party boss in Mexico’s 2000 presidential vote, locals in one sweltering Yucatan town filed out of their neighborhood polling site and went straight next door to collect their reward: a free pork sandwich and an orange juice.</p><p> For more than 70 years, Mexico’s powerful Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) perfected a key political transaction. Ordinary citizens provide support – and votes – in exchange for handouts or services from government officials. Rewards can come in many forms, from food packets to roofing materials, or even freshly paved roads. The practice is known as clientelism. And it helped the PRI hold on to power for most of the 20th century.</p><p>Yet when the PRI lost power in 2000, and competitive democracy was established in Mexico, clientelism didn’t disappear. It evolved.</p>
<p>That history offers a lens through which to view President Donald Trump’s September promise at a Republican convention in Dallas to give every American adult $5,000 if his party retains control of Congress in November’s midterm elections. For scholars who have studied clientelism in Latin America, Mr. Trump’s proposal raises important questions about the relative health of representative democracy in the United States.</p><p>“Clientelist practices damage democracy because they distort it,” says Cristina Tapia Muro, a political‑science professor at the Universidad de Colima, where she has researched how clientelism affects political participation. “Democracy is the exercise of choosing who governs us. But when you introduce the element of exchange, the selection becomes tied to something one receives, rather than stemming from genuine conviction.”</p><h2>Too rich to “buy”</h2><p>Forms of clientelism were once a common feature in the U.S., from Tammany Hall in the 1800s to the powerful Chicago political machine in the mid‑1900s.</p><p>Academics have found that the practice becomes less prominent, however, as votes become too expensive to “buy.”</p>
<p>“It’s often a product of poverty and inequality,” says Noam Lupu, director of the Center for Global Democracy at Vanderbilt University. “History shows us that when inequality declines and when poverty declines, clientelism also declines.”</p>
<h3>A ‘Vote Early!’ Sign</h3><p>A 'Vote Early!' sign is displayed on a monitor as then‑former President Donald Trump speaks at a campaign rally in Reading, Pennsylvania, Oct. 9, 2024.</p>
<p>Latin America ranks among the world’s most unequal regions. In the U.S., the gap between rich and poor is the widest it has been in a generation, according to the Federal Reserve. Clientelism “only makes sense if you have billionaires bankrolling elections and people for whom potentially $5,000 is quite a lot of money,” says Dr. Lupu.</p><p>Not everyone sees Mr. Trump’s promised payment as a clear case of clientelism, in part because there is no guarantee he can free up the trillions of dollars required to fulfill it. Clientelism is defined by both parties following through on the exchange.</p><p>“It’s indicative of the way the president thinks about politics in a very transactional way,” says Dr. Lupu.</p><h2>“Credit Claiming”</h2><p>These political transactions were once considered anathema in the U.S. Just before the 2000 Mexican presidential election, former President Jimmy Carter traveled there as an election observer. He concluded that “the ruling party was still using undue influence on voters with some threats of losing popular services if the PRI lost.” Mr. Carter said his goal was to encourage Mexicans to vote regardless of promises or intimidation.</p><p>After Vicente Fox won the race in 2000, he declared in his inaugural address that Mexico’s former, corrupt system of politics had “come to a radical end.”</p><p>A new multiparty system took hold in Mexico and ended the PRI’s 71‑year grip on power. But instead of disappearing, clientelism simply morphed, says Dr. Tapie Muro.</p><p>“Attempts have been made to put safeguards and protections in place to curb clientelism,” she says. “What that has done is caused clientelism to change, adapt, and find new ways to slip through the cracks.”</p><p>It’s still common to see busloads of voters and their families taken to Mexico City for political rallies, including during President Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo’s 2024 campaign. Today, when new social programs roll out, they’re accompanied by disclaimers emphasizing that the program is not party‑dependent. Yet politicians continue securing public credits—a practice academics label “credit claiming”—as noted by Dr. Tapie Muro.</p><p>President Sheinbaum’s party has been accused of leveraging social programs as clientelistic tools. She denied this at a recent event. “We don’t buy votes; we give rights to the Mexican people, which is very distinct,” she stated.</p><p>Professor Joy Langston, a clientelism expert at El Colegio de México, observes that the notion that “clientelism is dead” proved premature. “Good intentions didn’t win enough votes quickly,” she argues. “When you have strong mobilization capacity and local leaders willing to assist neighbors, clientelism works effectively across the political spectrum.”</p><p><a href="/monitor-highlights.html" class="csmmh active">Deepen your worldview<br/>with <strong>Monitor Highlights.</strong></a></p><p class="poli"><strong>Politics with respect</strong><br/>Get political stories with respectful analysis.</p><p class="book">There‘s a world of new ideas in every<br/><strong>Books newsletter</strong>.</p><p class="equa">There‘s more to life, enrich yours with<br/><strong>Culture & Learning</strong> weekly.</p><p class="scie">Follow humanity‘s discoveries with<br/><strong>Science & Nature</strong> stories in your inbox.</p><p class="cspe">Gain a <strong>spiritual perspective</strong><br/>from the stories in your inbox.</p><p class="comm">Want to understand the deeper impact of critical events? Learn the <strong>Monitor‘s insight</strong>.</p><p class="ad-login text-center"><span>Already a subscriber?</span> Login</p></p>praitine Francisco Ramírez, now unemployed as a furniture mover, reflects on the era when obtaining tangible benefits from politicians for exercising their right to vote felt achievable. “If every politician appears eager to help us, we can choose which figures aid us most,” he explains.
Washington long called out clientelism in Mexico, so seeing the United States possibly copying those patterns feels hypocritical to Mr. Ramírez, who adds.
Washington decried clientelism in Mexico for decades, so the fact that the U.S. may pick up where the PRI left off is rich—he calls it **hypocrisy**.
ALREADY A SUBSCRIBER? Login
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
The Christian Science Monitor was founded in 1908 to elevate journalistic standards and uplift humanity. Our mission is to “speak the truth in love.” We aim not to dictate thought but to provide essential knowledge and understanding for independent judgment. Join us in this endeavor by subscribing.
