Key Points
The Trump administration has launched a new phase in its trade policy. On July 15, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) announced a 25% Section 301 tariff on a wide range of Brazilian imports, citing unfair practices in digital payments, intellectual property, market access, and related areas.
The duties took effect on July 22 and apply to thousands of products, while certain items—including coffee, beef, orange juice, and aerospace components—were excluded. The move creates both opportunities and risks for U.S. companies; two firms worth monitoring are Nucor and Embraer.
Image source: Getty Images.
1. Nucor
One potential beneficiary is North Carolina‑based Nucor (NYSE: NUE). Brazil ranks among the top foreign suppliers of steel‑related goods to the United States, especially pig iron, a crucial feedstock for electric‑arc furnaces. Although some steel products were spared from the new tariffs because they already fall under separate Section 232 duties, the broader measure could still steer buyers toward domestic sources where feasible, offering a tailwind for Nucor.
Nucor is the largest steel producer in North America and continues to invest billions of dollars to expand capacity. Its downstream operations also provide exposure to construction, infrastructure, manufacturing, and energy sectors.
While tariffs—paid by importers—alone will not dictate Nucor’s future earnings, steel demand hinges on industrial activity and construction spending. Nevertheless, trade barriers that curb import competition have historically bolstered domestic pricing and plant utilization. If the current tariff framework persists, Nucor could see indirect benefits.
2. Embraer
On the flip side, São Paulo‑headquartered Embraer (NYSE: EMBJ) derives roughly 60% of its revenue from North America, making U.S. market access vital.
The final tariff schedule exempts civil aircraft and hundreds of aerospace‑related components, limiting the direct impact on Embraer’s U.S. operations. This exemption underscores the deep integration of aerospace supply chains between the United States and Brazil.
Still, the company is not wholly insulated. Trade disputes seldom stay static; additional tariffs, retaliatory actions, or wider restrictions could heighten uncertainty for future aircraft orders or complicate cross‑border supply chains. Even with aerospace exemptions intact, prolonged trade tensions could dampen investor sentiment toward Brazilian exporters in general.
Exposure to Brazil
Tariffs rarely yield clear‑cut winners or losers overnight. Many firms can respond by shifting suppliers, renegotiating contracts, or passing on higher costs to customers. Others gain simply because foreign competitors become less price‑competitive.
For the time being, companies with the greatest exposure to Brazilian imports—or those that compete directly against them—are likely to experience the most pronounced effects. Nucor stands to gain if domestic steel demand shifts toward U.S. producers, while Embraer may continue operating largely unimpeded as long as the aerospace carve‑outs remain in place.
A critical question for investors is whether Brazil will retaliate and whether this move signals the start of a broader expansion of Section 301 tariffs.
Also Read
- Trump’s July 2024 Approval Ratings Reflect Persistent Challenges Amidst Shifting Political DynamicsJuly 23Trump’s approval rating remains stagnant around the 35% mark, with disapproval rates exceeding 60% in recent polling, according to multiple surveys conducted in July. A Pew Research Center survey of 3,554 U.S. adults revealed a six-point Democratic advantage in generic congressional ballot preferences, with voters split between viewing former President Trump as a key voting factor. Of respondents, 42% indicated support for congressional candidates opposing Trump, while 22% expressed support for candidates aligned with him.July 23Emerrson College polling data from 1,100 likely voters showed Trump facing an 11-point Democratic advantage in the generic congressional ballot. Despite a marginal decrease in disapproval ratings, his net favorability remains negative, with 57% disapproving of his job performance. This aligns with other recent surveys showing a consistent erosion of public confidence amid evolving political discourse.July 17CNBC polling highlighted Trump’s approval rate dipping to 39%, with a disapproval rate exceeding 60% for the second consecutive month. Economic sentiment remains a core challenge, with 61% of Americans expressing pessimism about national economic conditions. This represents a historical low for Trump’s economic approval metrics during his presidency.July 16Washington Post/Ipsos polling maintained Trump’s July approval at 37%, with fewer than half of Americans anticipating economic improvement. Over 40% of respondents reported financial deterioration compared to Biden-era conditions, underscoring public concern about living standards and economic policy outcomes.June 19Nuclear program negotiations with Iran appear to have provided limited economic relief, with gas prices showing temporary decline despite ongoing security concerns. Midterm sentiment surveys continue tracking Democratic voting advantages, though high undecided rates suggest an open electoral landscape heading into November contests.June 15Attention has shifted from cost-of-living approval metrics to enduring concerns about regulatory policy. Harvard CAPS/Harris polling indicated Trump maintaining a 42% approval rating, mirroring Biden’s historical approval levels during midterm years. Iran’s fluctuating international relations remain a focal point of public discourse, with polls tracking shifting perceptions of foreign policy effectiveness.June 8While economic approval metrics decline slightly, immigration-related disapproval rates have exceeded 60% in multiple polls. Gas price expectations remain pessimistic, with nearly 60% anticipating rising fuel costs through election season. Legislative agendas continue to influence voter sentiment, with Democrats leveraging economic messaging to consolidate support.June 3Midterm forecasting models suggest Democrats could perform well in November elections, though voter turnout patterns remain undetermined. Former President Trump’s second-term trajectory parallels 2018 lows despite newer policy challenges. Regional economic indicators and workforce adjustments are emerging as secondary discussion points in post-Iran security phase surveys.
- Intel’s 11% Stock Surge on AI-Fueled Revenue Record
- Sonam Wangchuk Ends 26-Day Hunger Strike Over Education Reform Demands
- New U.S. Prosecutors Withdraw Subpoenas Targeting New York Times Over Trump Air Force One Coverage


