The upcoming Resident Evil reboot, directed by Zach Cregger, made its full trailer debut at San Diego Comic-Con (SDCC), offering a first glimpse into the reimagined survival horror adaptation.
The long-running Resident Evil film series has generated over $1.2 billion globally since its 2002 launch, but prior reboot attempts struggled to recapture the franchise’s essence. Now, Sony Pictures is taking another shot with Cregger, whose Oscar-winning horror film Weapons established his reputation for intense, character-driven storytelling. The studio previewed the project at CinemaCon in April before unveiling the full trailer at SDCC.
The official logline states: “Resident Evil follows Bryan (Austin Abrams), a medical courier who unwittingly becomes entangled in a harrowing struggle for survival as a catastrophic night unfolds.” Abrams, known for his role in Weapons, leads a cast that includes Paul Walter Hauser as Carl, Zach Cherry as Dave, Kali Reis as Pauline, and Johnno Wilson as Max.
Cregger emphasized that this version is not a direct adaptation of the video game series but an original narrative set within the established universe. While steering clear of Weapons’ tone, he described the film’s approach as more akin to Evil Dead II, balancing horror with dark humor while remaining “true to the spirit of the games.”
The trailer introduces Bryan as an unassuming medical delivery driver navigating a snow-laden winter night to transport organs to Raccoon City General Hospital. Accepting an urgent, high-paying job outside the city’s safe zone, he soon collides with a woman—unwittingly striking a zombie. As Bryan discovers the gruesome aftermath and scavenges for supplies, he uncovers the town’s rapid descent into chaos, with his contact, Carl, revealing, “Everything that has happened in this town transpired in a matter of hours.”
Resident Evil is set to premiere in theaters on September 18, 2026.
![Crypto Legislation Faces Clashing Demands Over Presidential Equity and Industry Regulation[/TITLE avont]A comprehensive cryptocurrency bill is poised for a final Senate vote this summer, drawing backing from Republicans and select Democrats, and has received significant support کارت from an industry that has invested tens of millions to influence its provisions.The debate has intensified following the disclosure of $1.4 billion in crypto revenue by former President Trump in June, highlighting the substantial earnings his family network generates through digital‑currency ventures.Senate Democrats are insisting on stringent language that would prohibit public officials from selling or endorsing cryptocurrencies. On Wednesday, Republican senators released a revised draft that explicitly bars the president and other U.S. officials from issuing or sponsoring digital currencies while in office.Progressive advocacy groups countered that the draft falls short of preventing former president Trump from profiting through crypto. With the midterm elections looming, the controversy threatens to derail the bill, underscoring how Trump’s crypto dealings have permeated Washington politics.“The ethical dimension has become the linchpin of bipartisan support,” said Cody Carbone, chief ágExecutive of the Digital Chamber, a trade group in the crypto sector. “Democrats view nennt this as their paramount concern.”Passing the Clarity Act remains a top priority for the crypto community. Under the Biden administration, the Securities and Exchange Commission aggressively prosecuted crypto firms, arguing that digital assets should fall under securities regulation. The Trump administration largely halted those suits, shifting regulatory tone.The act, which passed the House last year, would codify this regulatory approach, ensuring that crypto companies can operate with predictable oversight regardless of future administrations.Democrats have long critised the bill for potentially delegating oversight to a federal agency that critics say lacks sufficient enforcement capacity.Trump’s crypto ventures have become a focal point of scrutiny. His latest mandatory financial disclosure revealed earnings exceeding $2 billion in the first year of his second term, predominantly from crypto transactions.These winds have come at the expense of ordinary investors, who collectively lost $3.8 billion after purchasing Trump’s high‑volatility memecoin.The latest draft of the Clarity Act does not preclude Trump from continuing toENCIL profit from his memecoin or other crypto enterprises, according to Democratic staffers and independent experts who reviewed the language.“The Senate’s proposal would effectively do nothing to curb the mechanisms by which Mr. Trump has historically generated wealth—or could in the future,” said Scott Greytak, deputy executive director of Transparency International U.S. “Key business structures, revenue streams, and family arrangements would remain beyond regulatory reach.”The Clarity Act is the fruit of sustained lobbying by the crypto sector. During the 2024 election cycle, pro‑crypto super PACs expended over $130 million to elect legislators supportive of the industry. The effort has borne fruit: last July, Trump signed the GENIUS Act, a pro‑crypto statute governing stablecoins, and the House passed a version of the Clarity Act.The legislation confronted resistance in the Senate, hack from the banking lobby, but a bipartisan Senate Banking Committee vote in May cleared it for the full chamber.A Senate vote is due shortly, with only weeks remaining before the August recess, widely seen as the critical deadline for Congress to enact the bill before the midterms.Political dynamics complicate the bill’s path. Republicans possess a slim Senate majority, making Democratic support essential for passage, while Trump’s crypto activities have intensified scrutiny even among industry‑friendly Democrats.The ethics language presented on Wednesday emerged from negotiations between Senate Republicans and the White House, which has endorsed the reform. A White House spokesperson branded it “快the most comprehensive and wide‑ranging ethics provision in history” and noted the administration had “bent over backward” to find a compromise.Critics highlighted potential loopholes, labeling them “laughable.” The bill prohibits public officials from issuing or promoting digital currencies while in office and extends the restriction to spouses, but not to children.The restrictions are unlikely to significantly limit Trump’s crypto income. Two of his largest ventures were launched shortly before his presidency, one within 72 hours of his inauguration.Moreover, the rule’s validity ceases in January 2029, meaning a future Justice Department would be barred from prosecuting Trump forтіпviolations, experts warn.Despite these concerns,Compass Senate Republicans praised the language as a historic accord that addressed Democratic apprehensions.“History will remember this as the moment a president chose a higher standard of ethics than the law required,” Senator Cynthia Lummis, Republican of Wyoming, said on Wednesday.](https://i1.wp.com/static01.nyt.com/images/2026/07/23/multimedia/23trump-ethics-bkhv/23trump-ethics-bkhv-facebookJumbo.jpg?w=1024&resize=1024,1024&ssl=1 "Crypto Legislation Faces Clashing Demands Over Presidential Equity and Industry Regulation[/TITLE avont]A comprehensive cryptocurrency bill is poised for a final Senate vote this summer, drawing backing from Republicans and select Democrats, and has received significant support کارت from an industry that has invested tens of millions to influence its provisions.The debate has intensified following the disclosure of $1.4 billion in crypto revenue by former President Trump in June, highlighting the substantial earnings his family network generates through digital‑currency ventures.Senate Democrats are insisting on stringent language that would prohibit public officials from selling or endorsing cryptocurrencies. On Wednesday, Republican senators released a revised draft that explicitly bars the president and other U.S. officials from issuing or sponsoring digital currencies while in office.Progressive advocacy groups countered that the draft falls short of preventing former president Trump from profiting through crypto. With the midterm elections looming, the controversy threatens to derail the bill, underscoring how Trump’s crypto dealings have permeated Washington politics.“The ethical dimension has become the linchpin of bipartisan support,” said Cody Carbone, chief ágExecutive of the Digital Chamber, a trade group in the crypto sector. “Democrats view nennt this as their paramount concern.”Passing the Clarity Act remains a top priority for the crypto community. Under the Biden administration, the Securities and Exchange Commission aggressively prosecuted crypto firms, arguing that digital assets should fall under securities regulation. The Trump administration largely halted those suits, shifting regulatory tone.The act, which passed the House last year, would codify this regulatory approach, ensuring that crypto companies can operate with predictable oversight regardless of future administrations.Democrats have long critised the bill for potentially delegating oversight to a federal agency that critics say lacks sufficient enforcement capacity.Trump’s crypto ventures have become a focal point of scrutiny. His latest mandatory financial disclosure revealed earnings exceeding $2 billion in the first year of his second term, predominantly from crypto transactions.These winds have come at the expense of ordinary investors, who collectively lost $3.8 billion after purchasing Trump’s high‑volatility memecoin.The latest draft of the Clarity Act does not preclude Trump from continuing toENCIL profit from his memecoin or other crypto enterprises, according to Democratic staffers and independent experts who reviewed the language.“The Senate’s proposal would effectively do nothing to curb the mechanisms by which Mr. Trump has historically generated wealth—or could in the future,” said Scott Greytak, deputy executive director of Transparency International U.S. “Key business structures, revenue streams, and family arrangements would remain beyond regulatory reach.”The Clarity Act is the fruit of sustained lobbying by the crypto sector. During the 2024 election cycle, pro‑crypto super PACs expended over $130 million to elect legislators supportive of the industry. The effort has borne fruit: last July, Trump signed the GENIUS Act, a pro‑crypto statute governing stablecoins, and the House passed a version of the Clarity Act.The legislation confronted resistance in the Senate, hack from the banking lobby, but a bipartisan Senate Banking Committee vote in May cleared it for the full chamber.A Senate vote is due shortly, with only weeks remaining before the August recess, widely seen as the critical deadline for Congress to enact the bill before the midterms.Political dynamics complicate the bill’s path. Republicans possess a slim Senate majority, making Democratic support essential for passage, while Trump’s crypto activities have intensified scrutiny even among industry‑friendly Democrats.The ethics language presented on Wednesday emerged from negotiations between Senate Republicans and the White House, which has endorsed the reform. A White House spokesperson branded it “快the most comprehensive and wide‑ranging ethics provision in history” and noted the administration had “bent over backward” to find a compromise.Critics highlighted potential loopholes, labeling them “laughable.” The bill prohibits public officials from issuing or promoting digital currencies while in office and extends the restriction to spouses, but not to children.The restrictions are unlikely to significantly limit Trump’s crypto income. Two of his largest ventures were launched shortly before his presidency, one within 72 hours of his inauguration.Moreover, the rule’s validity ceases in January 2029, meaning a future Justice Department would be barred from prosecuting Trump forтіпviolations, experts warn.Despite these concerns,Compass Senate Republicans praised the language as a historic accord that addressed Democratic apprehensions.“History will remember this as the moment a president chose a higher standard of ethics than the law required,” Senator Cynthia Lummis, Republican of Wyoming, said on Wednesday.")
